Post reply

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by opckieran

- March 17, 2025, 15:55:02

Quote from: overcook steak on March 14, 2025, 09:00:39the vivobook 16 gpu performance is limited due to running single channel ram...what a worst article like userbenchmark...

Not seeing any literature supporting this single-channel claim, but that would explain the poor performance.

Posted by heffeque

- March 14, 2025, 11:35:44

And maybe even drivers not being optimized yet.

Seems like an article that prefers to have a flashy title than to actually investigate the issue itself.

Posted by overcook steak

- March 14, 2025, 09:00:39

the vivobook 16 gpu performance is limited due to running single channel ram...what a worst article like userbenchmark...

Posted by 996forever

- March 14, 2025, 04:59:54

The Vivobook 16 uses soldered DDR5-5600 (worst of both world, slow and non upgradeable) not LPDDR5x-8000 that should explain the difference. Power limit wise the chassis is actually quite generous.

Posted by Redaktion

- March 14, 2025, 03:04:27

It's not a great first start for the midrange Radeon 860M when it can't even match most older Radeon 760M laptops already in the market. Casual gamers may want to consider the Arc 140V or double-down on higher-end Radeon 880M or 890M options.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Radeon-860M-performing-even-worse-than-the-Radeon-760M-in-our-first-benchmark-results.978782.0.html