Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by julian.vdm

- February 04, 2025, 16:50:10

Quote from: Bizarro_NikoB on February 02, 2025, 07:20:33Love the look but agree with the short comings. Looks good though!

Thank you for this article. Keep up the good work!

I appreciate the kind comment. Yeah, honestly, if Lofree could get that web driver out and sort out the weird keycap wear thing, it would be a solid recommendation for basically anyone coming from a membrane or laptop keyboard. I'm working on a review of the Iqunix Magi65 Pro, now, and that basically solves most of my issues with the Flow Lite. It has much better keycaps, although no shine-through, and it supports VIA for proper system-agnostic remapping and macros. It's 65%, so that's a deal-breaker for some, but I really like it so far.

Posted by Bizarro_NikoB

- February 02, 2025, 07:20:33

Love the look but agree with the short comings. Looks good though!

Thank you for this article. Keep up the good work!

Posted by Redaktion

- February 01, 2025, 21:27:23

The Lofree Flow Lite 84 promises several improvements over its predecessor, along with the excellent, minimalist low-profile design and all-POM switches that made the original Flow special. The new additions include 2.4 GHz wireless support, adjustable feet, a metal volume wheel, and shine-through keycaps. But in our review, we found some disappointing oversights that spoil the allure.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Lofree-Flow-Lite-mechanical-keyboard-review-Excellent-low-profile-design-just-misses-glory.949872.0.html