News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Gallo123
 - January 18, 2025, 01:51:32
Who cares about costs when a large scale solar project takes 2-4years to build compared to Nuclear taking 8-20years.

One will be full amortized and taking in positive cashflow where the other may not even be built.
Posted by opckieran
 - January 18, 2025, 01:06:33
Quote from: D.H on January 17, 2025, 23:09:41Your guess on the cost of the project is low by at least a factor of 4.

DOE says installed cost for PV at grid scale is still above $1/W. www.energy.gov/eere/solar/solar-photovoltaic-system-cost-benchmarks

Battery costs of $60/kWh is factory for for raw cells. We're getting bids above $240/kWh for packaged, delivered, installed modules.

Plug these in instead and project costs are at least $10.2B before financing costs.

This jives with numbers given by Jigar Shah of the US Loan Programs office. In an interview, he indicated that if nuclear gets Nth of a kind back down to $12000/kW, that beats competing firm technologies.


You're forgetting one simple thing. In Middle East monarchies, labor is, ahem, shockingly cheap! One could even say it's free!

Posted by D.H
 - January 17, 2025, 23:09:41
Your guess on the cost of the project is low by at least a factor of 4.

DOE says installed cost for PV at grid scale is still above $1/W. www.energy.gov/eere/solar/solar-photovoltaic-system-cost-benchmarks

Battery costs of $60/kWh is factory for for raw cells. We're getting bids above $240/kWh for packaged, delivered, installed modules.

Plug these in instead and project costs are at least $10.2B before financing costs.

This jives with numbers given by Jigar Shah of the US Loan Programs office. In an interview, he indicated that if nuclear gets Nth of a kind back down to $12000/kW, that beats competing firm technologies.
Posted by Redaktion
 - January 17, 2025, 22:19:01
Thanks to a massive battery, a solar power system in Abu Dhabi can now consistently produce as much energy as a nuclear power plant. The power plant might benefit from unique local conditions, but not necessarily from a financial perspective.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/24-7-solar-energy-can-be-cheaper-and-more-reliable-than-nuclear-energy.948915.0.html