News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by mdongwe
 - September 14, 2024, 10:41:51
Quote from: Swiftly Breezy on September 13, 2024, 22:07:35Didn't Gelsinger say
TLDR opinion of the guy who brought Intel into its current sorry state.
Posted by Swiftly Breezy
 - September 13, 2024, 22:07:35
Quote from: Enma45 on September 13, 2024, 19:50:23Intel P cores still run extremely hot unless you keep the clock speeds lower. It will take a whole different architecture (eg. E cores) to change that. If E cores keep getting higher IPC while maintaining conservative clocks, maximum TDP could be kept under 200W for a 100% E core design.
Didn't Gelsinger say he doesn't believe in P cores (presumably for future mainstream consumer chips)?

Intel's way out of this power/heat mess would be to improve E cores in order to rely on them for everything.

Ironically enough, we'd be back to having a single core type again.
Posted by Enma45
 - September 13, 2024, 19:50:23
250W PL2? Intel what the FDLSKJF:SLJF are you doing? TDP should be 105W.

Intel P cores still run extremely hot unless you keep the clock speeds lower. It will take a whole different architecture (eg. E cores) to change that. If E cores keep getting higher IPC while maintaining conservative clocks, maximum TDP could be kept under 200W for a 100% E core design.
Posted by 3,2,1,1,1,...,1 BYE
 - September 13, 2024, 17:05:09
automatically self-destruct prior to purchase you mean...!?

13 -> 14: same happens with motorola screens, they automatically self-destruct and shatter prior to OS update to android 14 from 13
Quote from: Jonathan Jones on September 13, 2024, 16:27:22Yes, but will they self-destruct like 13th and 14th-gen chips is the real question.
Posted by Jonathan Jones
 - September 13, 2024, 16:27:22
Yes, but will they self-destruct like 13th and 14th-gen chips is the real question.
Posted by Redaktion
 - September 13, 2024, 15:56:18
As the fastest model, the Core Ultra 9 285K will feature 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores, followed by the Core Ultra 7 265K with 8 P-core and 12 E-cores, and the Core Ultra 5 245K with 6 P-core and 8 E-cores. There will also be KF variants with no iGPU for the  Core Ultra 7 and Core Ultra 5 processors. The iGPU side will only feature the Arc Alchemist solutions from Meteor Lake instead of the new Battlemage versions from Lunar Lake.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Alleged-finalized-specs-for-Intel-s-Arrow-Lake-S-Core-Ultra-200K-processor-series-leak-out.887899.0.html