News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Kaiserclyde
 - October 12, 2023, 15:46:12
Let's talk about the company trying to be independent for SoC yet no matter how hard they try they can't even match the stability of MTK, the one and only Samsung(Exynos)
Posted by Mr Majestyk
 - October 12, 2023, 08:15:34
Starting to hit peak stupidity now for phone SoC. Maybe Exynos 2800 can use an AMD 9950X and 6090 iGPU because phones need to getter hotter, throttle more and have crap battery life more than anything else and they are just stupidly slow to take selfies. Also bring back 1 year of OS updates while we are at it and raise prices 50%. All just as urgent.
Posted by Randy chan
 - October 12, 2023, 06:48:17
Regarding Samsung's upcoming exynos 2500, based on it's history of having issues with past chips along with it's joint Google-samsung custom made tensor chips also having issues, my advice is to go with Qualcomm snapdragon chips since Qualcomm has a far better history compared to Samsung. Also more software apps are better designed for Qualcomm chips than Samsung chips both exynos and tensor.
Posted by plehdoe
 - October 12, 2023, 04:02:16
Its cringe that companies refuse to use more than 1 X Core~
Posted by Redaktion
 - October 11, 2023, 14:56:32
The 2025-bound Exynos 2500 will feature only one Cortex-X5 core instead of the four rumoured earlier. The remaining will be replaced with Cortex-A730 cores in a 1+3+2+4 layout.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Exynos-2500-Updated-specifications-speculate-a-10-core-CPU-with-six-performance-cores.758796.0.html