Quote1 x 3.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A725
3 x 3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A725
4 x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A725
Og price of 750 for no high performance cores?
Browsing benchmarks: The Galaxy A57 scores higher (anyone knows why this is?, because hardware-wise, the 17T's A725 cores should be faster (maybe SAMSUNG has optimized the libraries?)):
Mozilla Kraken (lower is better): A57: 776.8 ms, 17T: 921.7 ms
WebXPRT 5: A57: 48 Points, 17T: 36 Points
Octane V2: A57: 55771 Points, 17T: 39454 Points
Jetstream 2.2: A57: 203.905 Points, 17T: 155.45 Points
But in Geekbench 6.7 the 17T (Cortex-A725) scores 26% (1744/1378) higher than the A57 (Cortex-A720), but it also costs 66% more (500/300).
For a 6.59 inch screen it would have been nice if it weighted 160g (like a Galaxy S series), instead of 200g.
12 GB RAM is nicer for running local AI LLM models, than A57's 8 GB.