News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Smith
 - Today at 08:39:18
This is if you can find LPCAMM2 in the first place.

Highest LPCAMM2 memory density I could find on a quick search is 64 GB. For SO-DIMM it's 64 GB per stick, so typically 128 GB on a dual-channel device that supports 128 GB RAM.
And when it comes to being able to fit an AI LLM model [that requires 128 GB], then -- let's say it's a laptop and not attaching external GPU shenanigans -- 128 GB of 5600 MT/s SO-DIMM is infinitely better than 64 GB of 8533 MT/s LPCAMM2.

Quote8533Mhz
It's MT/s (and it's "MHz") and why not 9600 MT/s? Am not interested in expensive only 8533 MT/s.
Posted by opckieran
 - Yesterday at 15:40:12
Well no sh*t: memory rated to run at 8533Mhz, in a much smaller (and currently niche due to how new it is) footprint, is going to be considerably more expensive than memory rated to run at 5600Mhz in a comparatively massive dual SODIMM configuration.

No mention of the fact that the Intel platform requires much faster memory either; 5600Mhz is basically a non-starter on it, and doing a quick price check shows how much more expensive SODIMMs get at 6400Mhz too (not currently aware of any faster, but I imagine 6600Mhz+ would be even more expensive; wow, imagine that!), thoroughly invalidating any complaints against the much faster LPCAMM2 modules.

Top notch journalism here folks... Water is wet, LPCAMM2 is superior to SODIMM. Hence, it is more expensive!
Posted by Redaktion
 - Yesterday at 12:47:41
Gigabyte for gigabyte, LPCAMM2 is almost twice as expensive than SODIMM at this early stage with just minor benefits for the end user.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Framework-Laptop-13-Pro-LPCAMM2-is-much-more-expensive-with-seemingly-little-to-gain.1356631.0.html