News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning - while you were reading a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by opckieran
 - Today at 15:40:12
Well no sh*t: memory rated to run at 8533Mhz, in a much smaller (and currently niche due to how new it is) footprint, is going to be considerably more expensive than memory rated to run at 5600Mhz in a comparatively massive dual SODIMM configuration.

No mention of the fact that the Intel platform requires much faster memory either; 5600Mhz is basically a non-starter on it, and doing a quick price check shows how much more expensive SODIMMs get at 6400Mhz too (not currently aware of any faster, but I imagine 6600Mhz+ would be even more expensive; wow, imagine that!), thoroughly invalidating any complaints against the much faster LPCAMM2 modules.

Top notch journalism here folks... Water is wet, LPCAMM2 is superior to SODIMM. Hence, it is more expensive!
Posted by Redaktion
 - Today at 12:47:41
Gigabyte for gigabyte, LPCAMM2 is almost twice as expensive than SODIMM at this early stage with just minor benefits for the end user.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Framework-Laptop-13-Pro-LPCAMM2-is-much-more-expensive-with-seemingly-little-to-gain.1356631.0.html