News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by rtrtr
 - Today at 17:47:56
Quote from: Daniel Schmidt on Yesterday at 07:51:21
Quote from: Aa on June 06, 2026, 03:27:18The battery test makes absolutely no sense. Every other major phone benchmark site (eg GMSarena, phone arena, etc) has this phone compared to it's peers much higher on the battery test. There's absolutely no way this phone has 1,700 more mAh than the magic8 lite and has 8 hours of battery less on the wifi test. It even gets out performed by some 5,000 mAh phone. It really just doesn't make any sense.

Have you folks considered running the battery test? I've read virtually every battery benchmark available on this phone online, and this one here is by far the most extreme outlier.
Quote from: Uadud on June 07, 2026, 02:08:15This.. just doesn't make sense. How does it have the same battery wifi test score as the Poco x7 pro when it has 2,500 more mah? Both use almost identical LTPS screens, same PPI, same resolution. Not to mention the 9500s is built on a 3nm SoC so the low usage on social medial/internet tasks should be much more efficient than the Poco x7 pro.. and it also has 2,500 more mah..?
I'm going to wait for the next update and then repeat the test. However, the idle test result is also slightly lower. I think the Wi-Fi module consumes a lot of power.


The wi-fi module cant be THIS power heavy and unoptimized. It just doesnt make sense. Other sources (eg gmsarena, phonearena) have shown its slightly inefficient in wifi tests compared to more expensive (eg x9 find pro) peers, but that is more likely due to the LTPS. Ive read probably every wifi battery benchmark that exists online for this phone, and this review is by far and wide the biggest outlier. I would investigate personally and see if you guys got a defective model.
Posted by Daniel Schmidt
 - Yesterday at 11:52:11
Quote from: Anonymus on Yesterday at 10:10:41Hallo,

Laut der Website von Poco hat das Smartphone einen Ultraschall Fingerabdruck Sensor verbaut.

Mfg
Ja, ist richtig. Weiß auch nicht, warum ich "optischer" in Eingabe-Abschnitt geschrieben habe. Ist korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis.
Posted by Anonymus
 - Yesterday at 10:10:41
Hallo,

Laut der Website von Poco hat das Smartphone einen Ultraschall Fingerabdruck Sensor verbaut.

Mfg
Posted by Daniel Schmidt
 - Yesterday at 07:51:21
Quote from: Aa on June 06, 2026, 03:27:18The battery test makes absolutely no sense. Every other major phone benchmark site (eg GMSarena, phone arena, etc) has this phone compared to it's peers much higher on the battery test. There's absolutely no way this phone has 1,700 more mAh than the magic8 lite and has 8 hours of battery less on the wifi test. It even gets out performed by some 5,000 mAh phone. It really just doesn't make any sense.

Have you folks considered running the battery test? I've read virtually every battery benchmark available on this phone online, and this one here is by far the most extreme outlier.
Quote from: Uadud on June 07, 2026, 02:08:15This.. just doesn't make sense. How does it have the same battery wifi test score as the Poco x7 pro when it has 2,500 more mah? Both use almost identical LTPS screens, same PPI, same resolution. Not to mention the 9500s is built on a 3nm SoC so the low usage on social medial/internet tasks should be much more efficient than the Poco x7 pro.. and it also has 2,500 more mah..?
I'm going to wait for the next update and then repeat the test. However, the idle test result is also slightly lower. I think the Wi-Fi module consumes a lot of power.
Posted by Uadud
 - June 07, 2026, 02:08:15
This.. just doesn't make sense. How does it have the same battery wifi test score as the Poco x7 pro when it has 2,500 more mah? Both use almost identical LTPS screens, same PPI, same resolution. Not to mention the 9500s is built on a 3nm SoC so the low usage on social medial/internet tasks should be much more efficient than the Poco x7 pro.. and it also has 2,500 more mah..?
Posted by Aa
 - June 06, 2026, 03:29:01
*1,700mah more than the g86 power and 8 hours less wifi time
Posted by Aa
 - June 06, 2026, 03:27:18
The battery test makes absolutely no sense. Every other major phone benchmark site (eg GMSarena, phone arena, etc) has this phone compared to it's peers much higher on the battery test. There's absolutely no way this phone has 1,700 more mAh than the magic8 lite and has 8 hours of battery less on the wifi test. It even gets out performed by some 5,000 mAh phone. It really just doesn't make any sense.

Have you folks considered running the battery test? I've read virtually every battery benchmark available on this phone online, and this one here is by far the most extreme outlier.
Posted by Florian Mayer
 - June 05, 2026, 11:50:07
Schwacher Lautsprecher, finde die richtig gut und im Equalizer kann man ja noch einiges verstellen, so Unterschiedlich ist die Wahrnehmung.
Posted by Redaktion
 - June 05, 2026, 09:17:35
Das Poco X8 Pro Max setzt mit dem Dimensity 9500s, einem 8.500-mAh-Akku und 100-Watt-Schnellladung neue Maßstäbe in der Mittelklasse. Das helle 6,83-Zoll-AMOLED-Display, IP68-Schutz und ein ultrasonischer Fingerabdrucksensor runden das Paket ab. Schwächen zeigen sich bei der Kamera und der Software. Ob das Poco X8 Pro Max seinen ,,Pro Max"-Titel verdient, klärt unser ausführlicher Test.

https://www.notebookcheck.com/Das-Monster-Akku-Smartphone-mit-8-500-mAh-und-Lichtshow-Test-Xiaomi-Poco-X8-Pro-Max.1262993.0.html