News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by DJ1
 - Today at 18:28:44
LMFAO at TN screen at 600 bucks. I remember putting up with a TN screen in 2011 from a 2nd hand laptop I got for 100 bucks and it was lousy then.

What the hell is 74% for? That *should* be a very good score.
Posted by BlaBlaBla
 - Today at 02:34:41
Quote from: jakub on Yesterday at 08:45:41That's just e-waste. Hate that's even allowed.
And yet it still scored 74% and "Average"...

Since when <80% became a bad score? Average means something not bad (rather good), but also not shining in any way - this one's just plain awful.
Posted by Terror Byte
 - Today at 02:23:33
Quote from: jakub on Yesterday at 08:45:41That's just e-waste. Hate that's even allowed.

Agreed, a POS at any price. That screen is a total disgrace that would have been a disgrace 20 years ago.

An iPad can do a far better job even saddled with that crappy iPadOS.
Posted by jakub
 - Yesterday at 08:45:41
That's just e-waste. Hate that's even allowed.
Posted by Redaktion
 - Yesterday at 05:34:51
The HP 255 G10 promises a lot of everyday usability for little money as an affordable office notebook. In the test, we show why the Athlon Silver 7120U, the dark TN display and the features clearly slow down the budget laptop despite its good maintainability.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/HP-255-G10-with-7120U-review-Small-budget-low-performance.1293092.0.html