News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Daviddmct
 - March 15, 2026, 15:03:22
Did you try power via a usb-c rather than mag safe? Using a 160w psu
Posted by Just to clarify
 - March 15, 2026, 08:34:48
Quote from: Ben S on March 15, 2026, 08:17:45
Quote from: Gabriel G. on March 15, 2026, 01:57:37this is well known, nothing new
It's news to me

I think what they meant by that comment is the same thing happened on the M1 max 14" which was released over 4 years ago.

There are people on Reddit posting years ago they returned their 14" M1 max for 16" M1 max models for this very reason.

So it seems not much has changed since then..
Posted by Ben S
 - March 15, 2026, 08:17:45
Quote from: Gabriel G. on March 15, 2026, 01:57:37this is well known, nothing new

It's news to me, or anyone else who hasn't potentially bought a Mac since the Apple silicon change.
Posted by Gabriel G.
 - March 15, 2026, 01:57:37
this is well known, nothing new
Posted by Redaktion
 - March 15, 2026, 01:00:20
If you are interested in the new M5 Max SoC, we recommend you get the larger MacBook Pro 16. The compact 14-inch model suffers from inconsistent performance. This is not only the case for the stress test, but also pure CPU or GPU performance.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-s-MacBook-Pro-14-cannot-handle-the-M5-Max.1249861.0.html