Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning - while you were reading a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Worthless

- Yesterday at 23:39:30

Passmark is a worthless benchmark.

Quote from: Kei on Yesterday at 20:42:58Intel's Core Ultra X9 388H is definitely promising

Unfortunately, I think it'll be short-lived now that N1X is going to be announced officially in a few months. Proper Nvidia drivers with RTX 5070 performance in an APU. Why would anyone get this anymore?

Posted by Sambit Saha

- Yesterday at 22:53:55

Oops, my bad!

I agree. I do believe this chip will be a great fit for mini PCs... could really benefit from some fresh competition in a space AMD has largely dominated.

Quote from: Kei on Yesterday at 20:42:58Please fix the title; it's Ryzen AI HX 470 not 370.

Well, Intel's Core Ultra X9 388H is definitely promising; it would be the only APU to actually deliver entry-level gaming performance (RTX 4050 level) since this chip will be equipped in high-end/premium slim/thin laptops. These laptops almost always have high-resolution displays. AMD's Radeon 890m iGPU of Ryzen's 370/470 failed to fit in this formula since it delivers playable fps only on 1080p-screen laptops, which is not the suitable case as mentioned above. That's why Intel will have a better advantage in this segment. However, I'm concerned about the pricing of laptops equipped with Intel's X9 388H chip; if they cost more than last year's releases, it would be almost a niche thing, since for higher pricing, going with a discrete GPU would always be a better choice.

Posted by Kei

- Yesterday at 20:42:58

Please fix the title; it's Ryzen AI HX 470 not 370.

Well, Intel's Core Ultra X9 388H is definitely promising; it would be the only APU to actually deliver entry-level gaming performance (RTX 4050 level) since this chip will be equipped in high-end/premium slim/thin laptops. These laptops almost always have high-resolution displays. AMD's Radeon 890m iGPU of Ryzen's 370/470 failed to fit in this formula since it delivers playable fps only on 1080p-screen laptops, which is not the suitable case as mentioned above. That's why Intel will have a better advantage in this segment. However, I'm concerned about the pricing of laptops equipped with Intel's X9 388H chip; if they cost more than last year's releases, it would be almost a niche thing, since for higher pricing, going with a discrete GPU would always be a better choice.

Posted by Redaktion

- Yesterday at 12:30:38

As revealed by recent Passmark listings, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H "Panther Lake" CPU appears to maintain a 10% lead over its predecessor in multithreaded tests, despite trading two P-cores for E-cores. The chip also maintained its lead over the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which also debuted at CES 2026.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-Ultra-X9-388H-chip-crushes-AMD-Ryzen-AI-9-HX-370-Core-Ultra-9-285H-in-latest-Passmark-appearance.1210727.0.html