News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by ArsLoginName
 - January 15, 2026, 01:58:36
Quote from: Terror Byte on January 15, 2026, 00:45:27The main takeaway is the 395 has 33% more cores and only delivers 15% more performance. Bandwidth constrained by still too slow memory. Needs LPDDR5X 10K+

Yep. But nobody seems to be able to get anything higher than LPDDR5x-9600 although Samsung announced LPDDR5x-10500 back in April 2024. Only been almost 2 years....
Posted by Terror Byte
 - January 15, 2026, 00:45:27
Came to say the same thing, what sort of clown thinks the 392 could touch the 395 in multithreaded workloads.

The main takeaway is the 395 has 33% more cores and only delivers 15% more performance. Bandwidth constrained by still too slow memory. Needs LPDDR5X 10K+
Posted by Redaktion
 - January 14, 2026, 17:43:17
The Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is one of AMD's new Strix Halo APUs showcased during CES 2026. Based on early benchmarks, the Zen 5 processor manages to outperform the similar Ryzen AI Max 390 and Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 but fails to close the gap to the existing Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/New-AMD-Strix-Halo-Ryzen-AI-Max-392-stars-in-early-benchmark-after-CES-2026-debut.1204390.0.html