News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Hal900
 - Today at 01:05:50
Quote from: Terror Byte on Today at 00:59:37
Quote from: Hal900 on Today at 00:50:13
Quote from: Yielar on Yesterday at 19:22:01Panther Lake won't be slower than Arrow Lake. You guys are so eager to pump out an article you'll post anything these days.
realistically it may be because of 18A

Yet the other day the Ultra 9 388 was faster than Halo 395+ and AL 285H, now we expect it to be slower than AL H. These guys will print any nonsense they can latch on to for clicks.

For a month now, it's been clear that 18A is worse than N3B. Panther Lake is better, but not everyone will see it. They haven't really changed anything in the CPU except the LPE module. It has lower clock speeds and that's it.
Posted by Terror Byte
 - Today at 00:59:37
Quote from: Hal900 on Today at 00:50:13
Quote from: Yielar on Yesterday at 19:22:01Panther Lake won't be slower than Arrow Lake. You guys are so eager to pump out an article you'll post anything these days.
realistically it may be because of 18A

Yet the other day the Ultra 9 388 was faster than Halo 395+ and AL 285H, now we expect it to be slower than AL H. These guys will print any nonsense they can latch on to for clicks.
Posted by Hal900
 - Today at 00:56:42
Maybe not here, but on 16 cores with an open power limit, something like 90 watts, Panther Lake should be 15% faster than Arrow Lake H, thanks to the LPE modules
Posted by Hal900
 - Today at 00:50:13
Quote from: Yielar on Yesterday at 19:22:01Panther Lake won't be slower than Arrow Lake. You guys are so eager to pump out an article you'll post anything these days.
realistically it may be because of 18A
Posted by Yielar
 - Yesterday at 19:24:56
Quote from: Bizarro_NikoB on Yesterday at 15:57:12And wasn't the 2xx series slower than the 1xx series because they focused on efficiency, or am I remembering it wrong?

No, Arrow Lake configurations scale to many more cores (up to 24 cores on some parts), giving them a clear advantage in sustained, multi-threaded tasks such as rendering, compiling, and heavier gaming workloads.� Lunar Lake typically has far fewer cores and lower power budgets, so in heavy, fully loaded scenarios Arrow Lake is the higher performer.
Posted by Yielar
 - Yesterday at 19:22:01
Panther Lake won't be slower than Arrow Lake. You guys are so eager to pump out an article you'll post anything these days.
Posted by Bizarro_NikoB
 - Yesterday at 15:57:12
And wasn't the 2xx series slower than the 1xx series because they focused on efficiency, or am I remembering it wrong?
Posted by Redaktion
 - Yesterday at 15:08:25
The Core Ultra 7 365, an 8-core Intel Panther Lake CPU, has leaked on Geekbench, giving us our first look at the potential performance of the chip. Sadly, based on the Geekbench 6.3 single and multi-core results, the Core Ultra 7 365's performance is nothing to write home about.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Core-Ultra-7-365-performance-leaks-Intel-Panther-Lake-CPU-is-reportedly-10-slower-vs-Core-Ultra-7-258V.1187138.0.html