News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Terror Byte
 - Today at 03:12:37
Quote from: ArsLoginName on Yesterday at 23:19:27iPhone 16 pro = 9.5 mAhr per minute of phone test
Samsung S25 = 10.526 mAhr per minute of phone test
Google 10 Pro = 11.5x mAhr per minute of phone test

But all processors made on some variation of TSMC N3. so very interesting. Seems like Samsung bloatware + screen + Snapdragon seem to be more efficient then Tensor G5 + screen + "pure stock" Android.

All that plus generally poorly written kernel, schedulers and of course Qualcomm's SD is just not as efficient as the Apple SoC.

Still, the gap has greatly narrowed and I'm hoping SD Elite Gen 2 brings further improvements.
Posted by ArsLoginName
 - Yesterday at 23:19:27
iPhone 16 pro = 9.5 mAhr per minute of phone test
Samsung S25 = 10.526 mAhr per minute of phone test
Google 10 Pro = 11.5x mAhr per minute of phone test

But all processors made on some variation of TSMC N3. so very interesting. Seems like Samsung bloatware + screen + Snapdragon seem to be more efficient then Tensor G5 + screen + "pure stock" Android.
Posted by Redaktion
 - Yesterday at 22:15:22
With a capacity of 4,870mAh, the Google Pixel 10 Pro has a smaller battery than most competitors, and Google's Tensor chipsets don't have the best reputation when it comes to efficiency. A battery life comparison now shows how the Pixel 10 Pro holds up against the Samsung Galaxy S25 and Apple iPhone 16 Pro.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Battery-life-test-Google-Pixel-10-Pro-takes-on-Apple-iPhone-16-Pro-and-Samsung-Galaxy-S25.1099310.0.html