News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by GeorgeS
 - August 25, 2025, 21:52:47
Quote from: anonimous on August 24, 2025, 15:30:21"x86 budget laptop killer."
At $700 price, the only way for competitors to die is from laughter.

Indeed!

IMHO: I've been saying all along. If OEM's wished/wanted these 'Win-on-Arm' to ACTUALLY compete, they would offer them at price points to compete with 'Chrome-Books'.

After all for ~$700 in 2025 can get you a x86 AND ether an iGPU or last generation dGPU that can actually run games. :)
Posted by anonimous
 - August 24, 2025, 15:30:21
"x86 budget laptop killer."
At $700 price, the only way for competitors to die is from laughter.
Posted by Worgarthe
 - August 22, 2025, 19:02:59
5 minutes top.
Posted by Edgar Ramirez
 - August 22, 2025, 19:00:44
13-14 ?
naaah...
8-9 hours for 15" version
Posted by Worgarthe
 - August 22, 2025, 17:25:55
Quote from: Edgar Ramirez on August 22, 2025, 12:08:40you will never ever get the 19 hrs running time on macbook... 10 hrs max
mb air running time is vrry overrated
Better to have 10 hours with at minimum twice better everything (starting with MUCH better display, impeccable compatibility with Linux and other regular stuff in macOS, and of course performance) than 19 hours with everything at minimum twice worse.

Although it's 13-14 hours (M4 Air 13 here).
Posted by Edgar Ramirez
 - August 22, 2025, 12:08:40
you will never ever get the 19 hrs running time on macbook... 10 hrs max
mb air running time is vrry overrated
Posted by Worgarthe
 - August 22, 2025, 00:46:42
11.7 fps in Baldur's Gate 3? Wow. Also what the heck are those PL values, that's insane; 65W and 50W?! Meanwhile the M4 Air is at 20/8W and it destroys this one here. Actually that same Air is 250€ more expensive but it is infinitely superior in every regard. Sure it's a smaller screen but it's better to have a smaller excellent display than a larger crappy one, no? Weird machine. But a great review!
Posted by indyp
 - August 22, 2025, 00:20:28
Probably not much considering you can get similar laptops from AMD and Intel that have no compatibility issues on Windows or Linux.
Posted by Redaktion
 - August 21, 2025, 19:23:06
With the Snapdragon X processor, Qualcomm wants to heat up the competition in the budget segment. A laptop with this chip: the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10. The Oryon CPU really shows its strengths here, even if there certainly are some compromises to this budget laptop.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/This-affordable-ARM-laptop-must-worry-AMD-and-Intel-Lenovo-IdeaPad-Slim-3-15Q8X10-review.1093361.0.html