Post reply

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Nolan

- Today at 03:33:39

Well now that we know that there's no honorable Chinese phone's.
Z fold 7 is over here like I'm the lightest thinnest foldable phone in the world that will out last every silicon carbon Chinese foldable out there with true flagship specks.

Posted by Skalamanga

- Yesterday at 22:31:50

Quote from: M.A. on Yesterday at 02:12:30
Quote from: Kev Hawkins on Yesterday at 01:06:45Wow the only thing the z fold 7 has going for it, personally I'd rather carry the extra 20g or 4 sheets of A4 paper and have an extra 1000+ mah extra in the battery 1600 in the VIVO's case.
When Samsung start building phones with specs that have a real world benefits and with an price that is comparable then the weight may become a factor but until then the other three brands mentioned are competing for my money.

And Samsung's battery still lasts longer even though smaller on paper. Big raw numbers dont mean it's better...performance and optimization is the key here.

in other news, no it doesn't

Posted by Adriano

- Yesterday at 17:01:35

Should have this on the beginning of this article:
Paid article

Posted by Don

- Yesterday at 15:02:18

Alex alex~ ur low quality article made me laugh.. hahahaa

Posted by A

- Yesterday at 12:12:37

Wow, we are talking a difference of 6g! BTW, what's the weight of a typical phone case?

Posted by Rick

- Yesterday at 11:42:53

It also has a much smaller battery than the Oppo N5 and significantly slower charging of said battery.

I'll take the larger battery and faster charging over a few g.

Posted by M.A.

- Yesterday at 02:12:30

Quote from: Kev Hawkins on Yesterday at 01:06:45Wow the only thing the z fold 7 has going for it, personally I'd rather carry the extra 20g or 4 sheets of A4 paper and have an extra 1000+ mah extra in the battery 1600 in the VIVO's case.
When Samsung start building phones with specs that have a real world benefits and with an price that is comparable then the weight may become a factor but until then the other three brands mentioned are competing for my money.

And Samsung's battery still lasts longer even though smaller on paper. Big raw numbers dont mean it's better...performance and optimization is the key here.

Posted by NonFanBoy

- Yesterday at 01:07:44

I should have knew that it is you again with another low quality article.

Posted by Kev Hawkins

- Yesterday at 01:06:45

Wow the only thing the z fold 7 has going for it, personally I'd rather carry the extra 20g or 4 sheets of A4 paper and have an extra 1000+ mah extra in the battery 1600 in the VIVO's case.
When Samsung start building phones with specs that have a real world benefits and with an price that is comparable then the weight may become a factor but until then the other three brands mentioned are competing for my money.

Posted by Redaktion

- July 15, 2025, 18:23:19

Discounting inner screen protectors is often used by smartphone manufacturers when advertising the weight of their foldables. However, an independent test conducted by Ice Universe highlights that the Galaxy Z Fold7 undercuts its Honor, Oppo and Vivo competitors by a wider margin than official statistics would suggest.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-Z-Fold7-reigns-supreme-over-Honor-Magic-V5-Oppo-Find-N5-and-Vivo-X-Fold5-in-early-independent-weight-test.1058825.0.html