News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by ArsLoginName
 - February 11, 2025, 00:11:21
So true MMD. But a title of "Ultra 275HX ties 14th Gen Raptor Lake" won't get as many clicks. So have to sensationalize like everybody does to draw more attention. It (the 275HX) *may* even perform worse on the 2nd run which would change the title to 'loses badly.' LOL.
Posted by MM0
 - February 09, 2025, 19:38:42
A 20pt difference (<1%) sounds like its within a margin of error that could be almost anything in the tested systems.  You get variance like this even run to run on the same system.
Posted by Luti
 - February 09, 2025, 15:42:20
18%? Where does this number come from?
If you divide two scores, you get 11.3%, no?
Please correct this.
Posted by Redaktion
 - February 08, 2025, 19:09:27
A Cinebench R23 score of Intel's Arrow Lake-based Core Ultra 9 275HX has emerged online. While it fails to best its Raptor Lake counterpart in single-core performance, it offers a double-digit increment in the multicore test.


https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-Ultra-9-275HX-fails-to-outperform-Core-i9-14900HX-in-Cinebench-R23-single-core-test.958608.0.html