News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by TruthIsThere
 - December 04, 2024, 07:15:33
No... no... NO!

This is just SUPER dumb, folks!

Ok... you purchase this mess that's compared to one of NVIDIA's lowest tier GPUs (that a 3060Ti+ just crushes) that's dated (4060 that's over 2-years-old) for ~300 bones?!?!

GTFOH with that [sic] foolishness!

There's NOTHING economical about purchasing this sad GPU that is already GENERATIONS behind for TOMORROW's DEMANDING apps/workloads!

Wake me up when Intel's GPUs FINALLY meet tomorrow's standards and Intel's GPUs are not still reliving the stone age relic times . 😏
Posted by A
 - December 04, 2024, 00:01:14
Quote from: Jonas Bee on December 03, 2024, 16:14:13I'm all for it if it's cheaper than Nvidia's 4060 and available in shorter versions (less than 20 cm would be great) and/or low-profile (we're in desperate need of more options for low-profile cards that are not total crap).

Aren't the new upcoming AMD processors rumored to have beefy igpus with similar performance?
Posted by Patover
 - December 03, 2024, 22:16:49
Quote from: Jonas Bee on December 03, 2024, 16:14:13available in shorter versions
...
low-profile

That TBP tho. May make the availability of small lower profile cards more difficult. Might just better off going with a RTX 4060, which is only 115w.

Hoping the lower end variant of rdna4 is better than this..
Posted by Jonas Bee
 - December 03, 2024, 19:21:14
Quote from: julia_top on December 03, 2024, 16:52:24We'll have to see the performance in the reviews, but after the news we've read about AMD's new graphics with RDNA 4 and the new Nvidia RTX 5000, I doubt Intel can even come close.
In any case, the more competition there is, the better for the end consumer, the better products at a lower price.
The same thing happened when Intel launched the first-gen Arc cards, they positioned them as competitors to the then-current generation of Nvidia 3000 cards just a month or two before the 4000 series came out.

They're always about a year late anyway.
Posted by julia_top
 - December 03, 2024, 16:52:24
We'll have to see the performance in the reviews, but after the news we've read about AMD's new graphics with RDNA 4 and the new Nvidia RTX 5000, I doubt Intel can even come close.
In any case, the more competition there is, the better for the end consumer, the better products at a lower price.
Posted by Jonas Bee
 - December 03, 2024, 16:14:13
I'm all for it if it's cheaper than Nvidia's 4060 and available in shorter versions (less than 20 cm would be great) and/or low-profile (we're in desperate need of more options for low-profile cards that are not total crap).
Posted by Redaktion
 - December 03, 2024, 15:32:22
Intel has officially shown off its Arc B580 and Arc B570 desktop graphics cards. Both are mid-range offerings that aim to compete with Nvidia's GeForce RTX 4060 at a fraction of its price.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Arc-B580-and-Arc-B570-New-desktop-graphics-cards-announced-with-affordable-price-tags.927306.0.html