News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by julia_top
 - September 25, 2024, 14:18:27
Nobody wants to buy Intel after the disaster of the Intel Core 13 and 14, which suffer from oxidation and they don't want to return the money or replace the defective chips. And now the new generation Core Ultra 5 245K are the same as a REHEAT of the previous generation.
Nobody is waiting for Intel, in the specialized computer forums people are saving money to buy the AMD 9000x3D that will be released in December and it is logical, AM5 platform for at least 7 years without having to change the motherboard, something that with Intel every 2 years or even 1 year, INTEL GETTING WORSE.
Posted by Won
 - September 25, 2024, 13:39:33
I used to read some articles in the WcCftech website containing meaningless content like this one. It seems NotebookCheck is also becoming a WC-TECH too!
Posted by Redaktion
 - September 25, 2024, 12:08:50
Cinebench R23 Multi-Core performance of the upcoming 14-core Intel Core Ultra 5 245K Arrow Lake CPU has leaked. According to the 25,000+ result, the ARL-S chip should comfortably leave the Ryzen 5 9600X and the Ryzen 7 9700X. However, Core Ultra 5 245K seemingly only offers a marginal improvement over the Core i5-14600K.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Leaked-Core-Ultra-5-245K-multi-core-performance-fails-to-noticeably-set-itself-apart-from-Core-i5-14600K.893009.0.html