News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by lolsungleaks
 - May 05, 2024, 16:44:26
You are a jackass that doesn't know his butt from his teeth.

Obviously RDNA3 is better, but 4 will prove to be going down an expensive path.

How do you feel about rethinking your life choices? Rude.
Posted by Fierce.XT
 - May 05, 2024, 16:10:10
Quote from: lolsungleaks on May 05, 2024, 04:58:34I think before they start ditching anything (cpu or gpu wise), they first need to developed something competitive (on a performance per watt basis) first, which they've thus far failed to do in the past 13+ years or so.

Am no expert, but wouldn't it easier to start with cpu first instead of cpu? If you build a fast cpu, you really don't need to worry about compatibility as long as it meets the isa spec. But for gpu even if you meet the graphic api spec, many games just won't run well because they were just optimized for specific pipelines and drivers in mind. Which I believe why intel is struggling so much atm despite the hardware being not that bad?

The lower efficiency is related to Samsung's manufacturing process being worse than TSMC's. The key to improving efficiency is for Samsung to improve its manufacturing process, RDNA3 is already better than all competitors.
Posted by lolsungleaks
 - May 05, 2024, 04:58:34
I think before they start ditching anything (cpu or gpu wise), they first need to developed something competitive (on a performance per watt basis) first, which they've thus far failed to do in the past 13+ years or so.

Am no expert, but wouldn't it easier to start with cpu first instead of cpu? If you build a fast cpu, you really don't need to worry about compatibility as long as it meets the isa spec. But for gpu even if you meet the graphic api spec, many games just won't run well because they were just optimized for specific pipelines and drivers in mind. Which I believe why intel is struggling so much atm despite the hardware being not that bad?
Posted by Fierce.XT
 - May 04, 2024, 14:37:43
In any case, it would still have AMD IP, Samsung isn't exactly a GPU specialist and would have to ask AMD for a hand, so it would be mutually beneficial.
Posted by Redaktion
 - May 04, 2024, 08:52:17
A new rumour says that Samsung plans to develop in-house GPUs soon. It may debut as early as 2026 alongside the Exynos 2600.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Exynos-2600-2026-bound-SoC-could-ditch-RDNA-GPU-for-an-in-house-alternative.834063.0.html