#12
Last post by NikoB - Today at 13:03:39
Human civilization since the end of 2019 is clearly in an artificially initiated transformation into a concentration camp totalitarian regime of control in the vast majority of countries (which has nothing to do with a single civilly responsible government and the institutions of its civil control with the complete erasure of rudimentary state borders), where civil institutions of control are weak or weakened presumptuous politicians and officials of all stripes. So far they have managed to keep the colossus of the human community from complete collapse (not because they are smart, rather they think that they are smart, but in reality they are idiots playing with a grenade), only thanks to a certain reserve of "survivability" in the global system and the still sufficient autonomy of each of them its plots. But when the system hits somewhere the last (critical) element of "survivability", everything will be over, a real uncontrollable collapse will begin, which no one will be able to stop.
Perhaps for some reason these kleptocratic circles believe that they and their descendants will be able to build some kind of working model of concentration camps/zones for the majority of the population and special "oases" for themselves. At the same time, they (already partly globally united kleptocratic circles of all countries) undoubtedly understand that the unproductive (albeit often well-educated, but not for creation, but for the ability to take away/redistribute the results of the labor of others, the productive stratum, in their favor) overhang of the population ( even though it is the main soil and electoral base for the emergence of criminal populist politicians and the possibility of prosperity for these same kleptocratic circles) will have to be somehow reduced significantly, and since in this case, the electoral base is lost, it will be obvious to do away with the remnants of "democracies" in all countries (one cannot allow that somewhere there is an excellent pattern of governance or behavior, mentality, civil liberties and rights), because otherwise, with a sharp drop in unproductive part of the population (especially urban) in comparison with the productive (which is no more than 25-30% left on the planet), they will undoubtedly begin to lose all elections under "democracy", i.e. will lose power and influence in society.
Consequently, concentration camp regimes, social ratings, etc. the mechanisms of explicit control, on the basis of which rights and freedoms are formed, according to patterns convenient for the ruling kleptocrats, will only strengthen, and all remnants of "democratic" institutions, and especially civil institutions, control of the ruling layers will be suppressed and destroyed in every possible way.
This can only be resisted by the productive layer of the population, which creates the results of labor useful for the development of civilization and which (the results of labor) are for the most part taken away from them (the productive layer) more and more, in their favor, by kleptocrats of all stripes and that unproductive stratum of the population that today in "developed" countries and those close to them clearly exceeded half of the population or more, which is the electoral base of populists and kleptocrats, because they feed them through the redistribution of the results of labor productively through unfair taxation and various other forms, supposedly to eliminate social stratification. But at the same time, this unproductive stratum (which is supposedly being helped to get out of the vicious circle of lumpenization) for some reason only grows and grows in all countries, which proves only one thing - this stratum in the transition period to a completely concentration camp totalitarian government is a convenient and necessary accomplice of populist politicians , representatives of kleptocratic circles. This vicious circle can only be broken by force, stopping the unjust flow of redistribution without any responsibility. Just like now with student loan forgiveness, people have to take responsibility for the choices they make. By them or their parents. If there is no responsibility, it instantly corrupts or allows one to shift personal responsibility from one (the real guilty) social group to others.
You cannot take out loans for a good life and education without paying your bills. Or think about why the system is designed in such a way that you, in principle, cannot get out of poverty, even if you make an effort. It's the same with education - if you choose the easiest path - you shouldn't be surprised that in the future you won't find a job and therefore will get bogged down in credit bondage. This means that you are still guilty by definition that you yourself or your parents could not predict which specialty would pay well (for a normal life with 2 children, also well-mannered and educated, no worse, but better than their parents) and at the same time have the least competition in society. Obviously, such specialties are given with extreme difficulty in learning, so most weak students go where it is easier, gaining expensive loans and not thinking at all that since they go where it is easier, then when starting an independent life they will quickly face great competition among those who also chose the easiest path in education and professions.
What does a lot of competition for a place lead to? That's right, bingo! To a fall in labor compensation! Those. if a weak "higher education" and a bunch of competitors for the same easy place are incomprehensible to a 17-year-old young man (or parents, who should be much more experienced in life) - then who is the moron if not this student himself? Pay the bill! Otherwise, write-off eliminates natural selection and filtering of the weak. A society that encourages a weak layer of the population (who doesn't even try, just goes with the flow) is doomed. And there is no pity for these young people and their parents.