The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 20 percent faster graphics performance than the RTX 2080 Max-Q and it even comes with the same 1 TB SSD capacity, 32 GB RAM, and 300 Hz display. Interested buyers would be better off with the newer Ampere SKU or waiting until the RTX 2080 Max-Q SKU drops in price.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/There-is-absolutely-no-reason-to-buy-the-MSI-GS66-GeForce-RTX-2080-Max-Q-because-the-faster-RTX-3070-model-is-the-same-price.520025.0.html
There's also no reason to buy anything with an Intel CPU in it when a superior AMD equivalent is available for almost every price/purpose segment.
Quote from: Daniel Kennedy on February 15, 2021, 00:43:22
There's also no reason to buy anything with an Intel CPU in it when a superior AMD equivalent is available for almost every price/purpose segment.
As far as I know, AMD-based laptops don't have thunderbolt ports, what could matter if you are going to use egpu
Quote from: Daniel Kennedy on February 15, 2021, 00:43:22
There's also no reason to buy anything with an Intel CPU in it when a superior AMD equivalent is available for almost every price/purpose segment.
Bruh
First off, "AMD <anything> is available" is an oxymoron.
Next, I just want to remind everybody that the Ryzen 7 3750H narrowly beats a 6-Watt Atom (e. g., Pentium Silver N6000) core-to-core... And that's WITH dual-channel RAM.
Now, it is clear that you're suffering from massive delusions. This Lisa Su, she's like Poison Ivy on your brain. You need to stop listening to YouTube personalities, and look at the bench/arithmetic data. You know, do the research.
Ryzen is AMD's worst attempt at ripping-off Core so far, even worse than the Phenom II; AND, they keep wasting precious 7nm cap. stamping out that amateur trash, so Apple/Samsung/Qualcomm (read: capable chip designers) are dragged into this paper-launch game of AMD, which is a disservice to them and their achievement. They are the Intel alternatives, not AMD.