The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is almost here, and it has shown that it can pretty much match NVIDIA's best efforts in Ashes of the Singularity. The RX 6900 XT gets within 3 FPS of the GeForce RTX 3090, despite being a third cheaper than NVIDIA's premier card.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/The-AMD-Radeon-RX-6900-XT-shows-up-on-the-Ashes-of-the-Singularity-ahead-of-its-December-8-release.507893.0.html
This article doesn't make sense. It praises the 6900XT for being so close to the 3090, then says the 6900XT actually tied with the 6800XT and should have scored higher but was bottlenecked by the CPU, then praises it some more for coming so close to the 3090 at 2/3 the cost. It seems it should be staying the 6800XT comes that close at even less (1/2?) of the cost of the 3090, and that the 690XT likely ties or even exceeds the performance of the 3090 at 2/3 the cost. The fact the even lower-end, cheaper 6800XT is actually the one to come within a few FPS of the 3090 is completely ignored.