komisch aber auch.

bin selbst Fan von foldables, allerdings neigen manche kaputt zu gehen, wie mein fold 4, Garantie angelehnt (17 Monate alt) weil Kratzer auf dem Scharnier waren.

Was war defekt? Das Modem. Kein Internet und WLAN mehr, das internet ist voll mit threads googlet fold 3/4/5 no wifi...

Das Kabel zwischen den displays ist Müll und auch mit dem fold 5 *nicht* behoben. Klasse Arbeit samsung, tickende Zeitbombe und im Zweifel keine Garantie, dass für gerne 2000€.

Ich und andere wären schön blöd wieder ein (Samsung)Fold zu kaufen.

Bei anderen Herstellern konnte ich nichts finden, scheint also ein Samsung Problem zu sein.

Ich rate jedem von Samsung folds ab.

I dont agree...
In my country Amd RX 7600 cost 80%-40% more than Intel A750
In fact in term of price, only the cheap models of the rtx 3050 can compare in prices...

Edgar Ramirez is a stupid bot.

QuoteRaptor Lake-HX options such as the Core i9-14900HX are not available on the Alienware x16 series likely due to thermal limitations since these processors require more power than the Meteor Lake-H series.

It's lie.
Check this review:
www.notebookcheck.net/HP-Omen-Transcend-16-2024-laptop-review-An-RTX-4070-gaming-machine-with-an-OLED-display.802778.0.html
It's just a complete shame for the Meteor Lake cores to again lose a colossal 1.5 times in PL1 mode in favor of outdated cores at "10nm++++". This is a shock!
PL1=55W/PL2=130W...start with 3900+ points in CBR15 and 2700+ sustained with 55W vs same sustained result for 185H on 105W! Shame for Meteor Lake and Dell developers! Meteor Lake with "7nm" from Intel is literally 2 times inferior in energy efficiency to outdated Raptor cores at "10nm+++++"! It's kind of surreal!

www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-Legion-Pro-5-16IRX9-laptop-review-Great-performance-but-a-little-heavy.817404.0.html
14900HX on 104W vs Ultra 9 185H on 105W - It's just a complete shame for the Meteor Lake cores to again lose a colossal 1.5 times in PL1 mode in favor of outdated cores at "10nm++++". This is a shock!

www.notebookcheck.net/Eurocom-Raptor-X17-Core-i9-14900HX-laptop-review-175-W-GPU-for-maximum-performance.809181.0.html
But here the same author clearly lied even more - according to his "review" it turns out that the 14900HX, at supposedly PL1=63W, produces as many as 4000+ points in CBR15. Do you believe these false numbers in this review?

www.notebookcheck.net/Acer-Predator-Helios-18-2024-laptop-review-New-hardware-for-the-18-inch-gamer.808564.0.html
And here another author claims that the 14900HX produces more than 3800+ points in CBR15 at PL1=93W!
Do you still believe NB reviews and its authors?

www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-Legion-7-16-G9-laptop-review-A-gaming-machine-with-a-3-2K-display-HX-CPU-and-an-overclocked-RTX-4070-laptop.826933.0.html
Already the 3rd author assures that the 14900HX produces stable 3900+ points in CBR15 at PL1=90W versus the shameful 2700 points of the newest top-end Meteor Lake with PL1=105W!
Do you believe this author too?


After all this, is it worth reading NB reviews with such data, where they are convinced that the old Raptor cores are up to 1.5 times faster than the latest Intel cores with the same consumption?

Ich habe letztens einen Monitor von Kuuori auf Amazon gekauft und habe bisher keinen anderen gefunden (diesen KTC eingeschlossen) der da mithalten kann:
4K (obwohl nur QHD beworben wird)
240Hz
Mini-LED mit 500nits (Herstellerangabe)
27"
95% Adobe
tolles, modernes Design in weiß

und das Alles für lächerliche 270€.
Habe schon einen 49" QLED von Samsung und finde die Bildqualität beim Kuuori fast besser, aufgrund der hohen Helligkeit und tollen Kontraste.

" Web browsers had very snappy response and performance many years ago" lol what are you smoking? Browsers have never had snappy performance.

Also, this whole article feels like a farse. You deliberately chose to use less JS and more CSS in a complete rewrite of the application, of course the performance is better. I'm not sure you proved the performance bottleneck was React though, sounds like your own code probably wasn't great either.

Hm, I had been under the impression that HP already retired these consumer-antagonizing 16" 16:9 panels. These are the only remaining obstacle in the way of making this size label a reliable indicator of taller aspect ratios.

Maybe next gen.

Quote from: Enma45 on Today at 20:34:5390 % der Bevölkerung streben nach Freiheit und Mobilität mit ausreichend Grafikleistung von CPU + iGPU + NPU

Du meinst, bei der Freiheit und Mobilität geht es um die Rechenleistung? Dann einfach dieses dein PC allen in Afrika und ähnlichen Ländern bis nicht mehr geht mal spenden und Problem gelöst - sie sind dann frei und mobil. Und alle andere laute und gute Begriffe noch dazu.

You forgot to measure SOC temperature under load. It is reaching toasty 100 °C under just single core loads. Also the SOC is severely underpeforming because of that, it is always running at just 85% of maximum frequency (GPU for example NEVER (and I really mean never) reaches 680 MHz, only 615 MHz, thats almost 10% performance lost, same with the CPU.
Xiaomi seriously screwed up cooling on this tablet, as the SOC doesn't seem to have any adequate cooling solution like heatpipe or even just thermal contact to the body whatsover, based on the insane rate the temperature rises under the slightest of loads (jumps from 30 to 70 °C when opening apps or swiping in launcher in a fraction of a second).

This makes the device very unreliable, as such thermal cycling will eventually crack the solder joints on the SOC. All of this could have been avoided, if there was just a tiny bit more of thermal mass (like the 12 inch aluminum body).

Im really regretting buying this tablet, as with combination of extremely buggy and lacking OS, along with zero software support and total ignore from Xiaomi regarding any issues, it feels like I bought cheap 50$ knockoff and not "premium 700$" tablet.