The Intel Core i7-11700K has made an incredible impact at a highly contentious synthetic benchmark site. The Rocket Lake-S part has outscored the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X in multi-core tests and has achieved a record average benchmark percentage of 113%, leaving the competition far behind. However, the i7-11700K managed these feats on UserBenchmark.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Record-breaking-Intel-Core-i7-11700K-blows-away-the-AMD-Ryzen-9-5900X-and-Ryzen-9-5950X-in-single-core-and-multi-core-testing-but-this-is-on-UserBenchmark.526264.0.html
> but this is on UserBenchmark
Nevermind then.
One dude probably used some cheats to get that score, or the program fucked up. Userbenchmark is way too unreliable for anything
Plus, how tf does a 9900K get a higher performance rating than a 5950X???That's how u know that userbenchmark cannot be used for anything
The moment the post mentioned Userbenchmark, I was like "Rightttt, I'll wait for other trustworthy tech YTbers to validate this...."
Did you ever read that AMD is "record-breaking?" Huh? Oh that's right, you didn't. AMD 4000 series mobile completely destroyed Intel, and that got no dedicated article only only the CPU.
This site is clearly paid by Intel
Please, at least read the article before commenting... as Notebookcheck points out, the "performance score" of the 10700K is compared to the 5950X using eight of it's sixteen cores.
I.e. Notebookcheck is very clearly saying that Userbenchmarks got these results by crippling the 5950X.
Intel Userbenchmark
Why do you keep promoting that scam "Userbenchmark"? It had been discussed way too many times this scam deserves. There are enough trustworthy real benchmarks like Cinebench - which is indeed used by reputable vendors when comparing platforms and cpus. In Cinebench i7-11700K has its right place - just below 5600X/5800X in single-core and below 5800X in multi-core.
But you keep posting and posting some scam - what for? Generate cheap traffic?
Quote from: Wereweeb on March 04, 2021, 22:32:13
Please, at least read the article before commenting... as Notebookcheck points out, the "performance score" of the 10700K is compared to the 5950X using eight of it's sixteen cores.
I.e. Notebookcheck is very clearly saying that Userbenchmarks got these results by crippling the 5950X.
You should know that NBC needs clickbait-worthy title to get more clicks
People who aren't intel employees still use Userbench?
Quote from: Jordan Eilbert on March 05, 2021, 07:41:37
People who aren't intel employees still use Userbench?
Journalists? For getting easy clickbait.
They've been working tirelessly to invent the scoring rules which would put Intel ahead. :D
hahahahaha INTEL likes better Forcing everyone to change the Plate if they want to use the 11th Generation of 14nm ++++ that is Plate = € 300 + 500 Processor = € 800 what a bad taste INTEL joke
Disadvantages of the 11th Generation:
Produces High consumption you will pay double in the electricity bill
Excess temperature, your processor will last less years.
Manufacturing at 14nm +++ vs AMD at 7nm
INTEL forces you to change your License Plate, spend € 300
In just 8 months, the 12th Generation with DDR5 + PCI 5.0 comes out, I would wait.
AND NOW THE PRICE ALMOST $ 500
I wonder if intel wants to self-destruct because no one will buy this processor.
Procesor, ram, motherboard already costs 400 euro :(
pls don't make those kind of web goes on top of google search again :(
I trusted more passmark benchmark site than userbench...
Nobody cares for Userbench benchmark, such a sensless benchmark tool.
Well well well, what happened to Intel 11700k will slaughter AMD? According to Anandtech recent review of the 11700k, the 11700k can't even beat the 5800x in a majority of the games tested as well as professional workloads. Intel touted 19%IPC yeah right only for math heavy, the IPC for integer workload is bad like only 13%, plus for a monolithic architecture it regressed in terms of cache latency, facepalm TF.
whether intel or AMD, both only burn pockets. threadripper is costly, ryzen is double channel, intel is outdated 14nm and finally ddr5 will make current motherboards obsolete even if not having any definitive advantage. so buying new processor at that high price is simply ridiculous, atleast not good time to upgrade. if its extremely necessary to buy new one, laptop or low end intel only makes sense for time being so that upgrade is not repent year after. AMD had gone crazy with prices otherwise.
es falso ese core i7 11700k no vence al ryzen 9 5950x para nada , ahi se muestra que solo se usa test pero 8 nucleos vs 8 nucleos, no se utiliza la potencia total de 16 nucleos ,
It is false that core i7 11700k does not beat the ryzen 9 5950x at all, there it shows that only test is used but 8 cores vs 8 cores, the total power of 16 cores is not used
this is an intel's fan site, don't loose your time with benchmarks