Apple has begun sending out invites for its first event of 2022 called "Peek Performance". The company is slated to launch a new iPhone, iPad and MacBooks powered by the M2 chip. One can watch it on March 8 at 10:00 PST.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-confirms-the-date-and-time-for-its-Peek-Performance-event.605705.0.html
"167:100 >> laptop, desktop, tv"
Do you want to say "The aspect ratio 167:100 applies to laptop, desktop, tv" or "...should apply..."?
"167:73 >> mobile"
I have got no idea what you might mean by "mobile".
"167:127 >> pad"
Do you mean tablets? Are you saying that 167:127 should be their aspect ratio?
"167:154 >> watch"
Watches have that ratio or do you say that they should have it?
"154:167 >> foldable mobile"
Are you saying that whatever foldable mobile devices are there, they should have the aspect ratio 154:167?
Why do you suggest three digit numbers? Are single or two digit ratios not good enough?
Why do you suggest exactly these ratios?
screen aspect ratio:
166:100 (horizontal length:vertical length) >> laptop, desktop, tv
166:74 (vertical length:horizontal length) >> mobile
166:126 (horizontal length:vertical length) >> tablet (landscape)
166:152 (vertical length:horizontal length) >> watch
166:152 (horizontal length:vertical length) >> foldable mobile (when open)
Quote from: RobertJasiek on March 07, 2022, 13:48:02"167:100 >> laptop, desktop, tv"
Do you want to say "The aspect ratio 167:100 applies to laptop, desktop, tv" or "...should apply..."?
"167:73 >> mobile"
I have got no idea what you might mean by "mobile".
"167:127 >> pad"
Do you mean tablets? Are you saying that 167:127 should be their aspect ratio?
"167:154 >> watch"
Watches have that ratio or do you say that they should have it?
"154:167 >> foldable mobile"
Are you saying that whatever foldable mobile devices are there, they should have the aspect ratio 154:167?
Why do you suggest three digit numbers? Are single or two digit ratios not good enough?
Why do you suggest exactly these ratios?
>> horizontal:vertical
mobile >> 74:166
mobile flip >> 126:333 (126:166.5 folded)
mobile fold >> 166:139 (83:139 folded)
monitor >> 166:100
monitor double >> 333:126
monitor triple >> 499:139
tablet (portrait) >> 126:166
watch >> 139:166
Quote from: RobertJasiek on March 07, 2022, 13:48:02"167:100 >> laptop, desktop, tv"
Do you want to say "The aspect ratio 167:100 applies to laptop, desktop, tv" or "...should apply..."?
"167:73 >> mobile"
I have got no idea what you might mean by "mobile".
"167:127 >> pad"
Do you mean tablets? Are you saying that 167:127 should be their aspect ratio?
"167:154 >> watch"
Watches have that ratio or do you say that they should have it?
"154:167 >> foldable mobile"
Are you saying that whatever foldable mobile devices are there, they should have the aspect ratio 154:167?
Why do you suggest three digit numbers? Are single or two digit ratios not good enough?
Why do you suggest exactly these ratios?
>> horizontal:vertical
mobile >> 77:166
flip mobile >> 73:166 (73:83 folded)
fold mobile >> 166:153 (83:153 folded)
monitor >> 166:100
double monitor >> 333:126
triple monitor >> 499:139
tablet (portrait) >> 126:166
watch >> 139:166
Quote from: RobertJasiek on March 07, 2022, 13:48:02"167:100 >> laptop, desktop, tv"
Do you want to say "The aspect ratio 167:100 applies to laptop, desktop, tv" or "...should apply..."?
"167:73 >> mobile"
I have got no idea what you might mean by "mobile".
"167:127 >> pad"
Do you mean tablets? Are you saying that 167:127 should be their aspect ratio?
"167:154 >> watch"
Watches have that ratio or do you say that they should have it?
"154:167 >> foldable mobile"
Are you saying that whatever foldable mobile devices are there, they should have the aspect ratio 154:167?
Why do you suggest three digit numbers? Are single or two digit ratios not good enough?
Why do you suggest exactly these ratios?
>> horizontal:vertical
mobile >> 80:166
flip mobile >> 73:166 (73:83 folded)
fold mobile >> 166:153 (83:153 folded)
monitor >> 166:100
double monitor >> 333:126
triple monitor >> 499:139
tablet (portrait) >> 113:166
watch >> 139:166
Quote from: RobertJasiek on March 07, 2022, 13:48:02"167:100 >> laptop, desktop, tv"
Do you want to say "The aspect ratio 167:100 applies to laptop, desktop, tv" or "...should apply..."?
"167:73 >> mobile"
I have got no idea what you might mean by "mobile".
"167:127 >> pad"
Do you mean tablets? Are you saying that 167:127 should be their aspect ratio?
"167:154 >> watch"
Watches have that ratio or do you say that they should have it?
"154:167 >> foldable mobile"
Are you saying that whatever foldable mobile devices are there, they should have the aspect ratio 154:167?
Why do you suggest three digit numbers? Are single or two digit ratios not good enough?
Why do you suggest exactly these ratios?