Good choice, take 2. Asus' update of the Zenbook UX305 is not extensive by any means with a Skylake m3 CPU instead of a Broadwell SoC standing out as the notable difference. In the other areas, the UX305CA inherits both the strengths and weaknesses of the predecessor, which still makes it a solid choice in our book. This time around, we are taking a look at the version of the subnotebook with Full-HD display panel.
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-UX305CA-EHM1-Subnotebook-Review.154422.0.html
Why did this skylake version receive so much lower skores than the Broadwell FullHD version you reviewed earlier?
Broadwell - Skylake
Chassis 98% --> 86%
Pointing device 93% --> 83%
Display 88% --> 85%
Keyboard 88% --> 85%
And yet the battery life was the same at 91%? Despite there being over a 2-hour difference?
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-UX305CA-EHM1-Subnotebook-Review.154422.0.html
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-UX305FA-Subnotebook-Review.140770.0.html
I would like to see a review of the top end m7 skylake version with the QHD display. I am hopeful that it''ll score even higher than this particular model. :D
At least in Scandinavia the only model for sale is 8gb/128gb at almost 900 €, which is in my opinion not so good value.
I went and asked from one shop and apparently Asus has no interest in selling 8gb/256gb models to Europe in 2015.
Quote from: Meh on November 22, 2015, 17:34:43
At least in Scandinavia the only model for sale is 8gb/128gb at almost 900 €, which is in my opinion not so good value.
I went and asked from one shop and apparently Asus has no interest in selling 8gb/256gb models to Europe in 2015.
Netonnet, which you can find in at least Sweden and Norway has the 8/256gb model at 8999SEK in Sweden. They usually have the exact same products in Norway if I remember correctly.
A bit pricy? Yes.
I blame the usd exchangerate.
Quote from: Joel on November 22, 2015, 11:13:52
And yet the battery life was the same at 91%? Despite there being over a 2-hour difference?
The battery score is automaticlly calculated and takes the additionally available runtimes (we also ran the Reader's and Classic tests in addition to the WLAN test) into consideration.
That said, the runtime during the WLAN test was shorter than expected - surprising considering the QHD+ version ran just as long. Just to be sure, we ran the test twice...but the result stayed the same.
Bernie
Quote from: Joel on November 22, 2015, 11:11:35
Why did this skylake version receive so much lower skores than the Broadwell FullHD version you reviewed earlier?
While some of the scores are calculated automatically, others are entered manually and might not only change depending on the editor conducting the review, but also over time. So while one editor might hand out 4 out of 5 points in one particular sub-section (for example, the possible typing speed, which is highly subjective), another might score it 5 out of 5. That change alone can explain the difference in the final score of the respective section.
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Our-Test-Criteria.15394.0.html (http://www.notebookcheck.net/Our-Test-Criteria.15394.0.html)
curious how it would perform with Windows 8 in regard to battery life.anyone willing to test it?
Quote from: Bernie Pechlaner on November 23, 2015, 02:22:45
Quote from: Joel on November 22, 2015, 11:11:35
Why did this skylake version receive so much lower skores than the Broadwell FullHD version you reviewed earlier?
While some of the scores are calculated automatically, others are entered manually and might not only change depending on the editor conducting the review, but also over time. So while one editor might hand out 4 out of 5 points in one particular sub-section (for example, the possible typing speed, which is highly subjective), another might score it 5 out of 5. That change alone can explain the difference in the final score of the respective section.
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Our-Test-Criteria.15394.0.html (http://www.notebookcheck.net/Our-Test-Criteria.15394.0.html)
Thanks for clearing that up, you have an awesome site!
Just a suggestion: why dont you post power consumption chart so we can compare it to ux305fa review since fhd battery life is 2h shorter?
thanks
I'm really disappointed that you did not even mention the keyboard, except to note that it isn't backlit. Nor does the previous model "review" that you reference, which seems like little more than a product announcement. Keyboard (and touchpad) quality and user experience are very important questions - especially on notebooks! And this is a notebook site, right?
Another keyboard question. The picture shows a power key in the upper right corner. This is exactly where I would expect the Delete key. So I am sure to be hitting the power key inadvertently. Does touching this key shut down the machine? That would be incredibly stupid but, on many desktop keyboards it does so. Nobody seems to have the intelligence to design-in a "hold" time e.g. you must press the key for 2 sec to shut down.
@Bernie. Thanks for this review. I actually played on one the other day and was impressed with its build quality, lightness and screen colors. Less so with is non-illuminated keyboard...
But in my country this laptop FHD config is only sold with a 128 Go SSD. Do you know the specifications of the m.2 Micron m600 that was in the Asus. Does it have a b-key connector or a proprietary one, is it 80 mm or 60 mm? Is it easily removable or soldiered on the mother board?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Really nice deal for one of these in Canada, with 8GB / 256GB SSD (and oddly the QHD screen as well).
$649
http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msca/en_CA/pdp/ASUS-ZenBook-UX305CA-UHM4T-Signature-Edition-Laptop/productID.327234200
Quote from: Jesse on December 29, 2015, 19:24:53
Really nice deal for one of these in Canada, with 8GB / 256GB SSD (and oddly the QHD screen as well).
$649
http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msca/en_CA/pdp/ASUS-ZenBook-UX305CA-UHM4T-Signature-Edition-Laptop/productID.327234200
Goddammit that's about 450€. Would get one in a heartbeat if I could pay that price.
Thinking of getting this and using for occasional lightroom and very basic Photoshop stuff.
Do you feel the processor and RAM is enough to handle this?