"Waitwhat" You're not very smart and obviously a puppet of Dan if not Dan himself. This has nothing to do with a cult, but nice try on redirecting. Also, no child was every in real danger. There was a person at the wheel ready to hit the brakes far sooner than the cold getting hit by the car. Dangerous would've been to recreate this without a person in the vehicle to intervene. In San Francisco, there are CRUZE autonomous vehicles that are allowed to drive in the evenings and at night without any driver or passenger in the car. They stop at intersections and slow down for children ALL THE TIME. Cruze is more dangerous than the Tesla trials. Also, more dangerous is to not have the software closest to fully realized bed axed as it could save a lot of children from being ran over by distracted drivers. I was once told the story by a lady who had two daughters and one day they were crossing the street and a big truck driver didn't stop, the older child realized the danger and without thinking pushed the younger sibling out of harms way, thus ending her own life to save her sister. THIS IS THE REAL DANGER! Tesla shared all of their technology in their early days in order to cultivate collaboration and to allow other companies to create EVs themselves. And while this ensures competition, this also created the landscape necessary where others can thrive for the sake of stopping global warming. Green Hills is doing the EXACT OPPOSITE but attempting to axe anyone else in the hopes they are the ONLY software at the expense of children getting ran over daily by distracted clients by "Engineering" videos to create a "No Win Scenario" for FSD, further exacerbated by the driver actually accelerating towards the dummy child. This is CRIMINAL!!!