Recent posts
#1
Last post by LNL incoming - Today at 20:21:10
Based on rumors and leaked benchmarks of Lunar Lake, I think x86 will quickly catch up with ARM on battery life AND efficiency and still be the better choice when it comes to software and driver compatibility and iGPU performance. the 680m and 780m kinda proved this. And I doubt AMD is just sitting on their hands with upcoming APUs like Strix Point so they should be going all in on getting new chips on TSMC's upcoming 2nm.
#2
Last post by Ikek - Today at 20:18:44
Seems like AI will be the new startup fad....
#6
Last post by George - Today at 19:47:32
While it is good to see that MS is working on getting Windows Games on ARM IMHO:
- the <= 60 FPS comes from Console gaming, some titles are fine at 30FPS, others not so much
- WIN11 "bloatware", forgetting the "features" that turn themselves back on just peek at the size of the KERNEL!! Every version of WIN has a larger kernel footprint then the previous version.
"Stock" WIN has countless 'services' running that the end user may (and likely WON'T) have any need or use for. I generally expect & set aside 1-2hrs for every new WIN powered device to 'clean up' the OS.
Granted IDK what others are currently experiencing with their new PC's, there was a time in the not to distant past that it might of required ALL DAY to rid your new PC of ALL THE BLOATWARE the OEM had included on it.
My WINBoxes run in VERY sheltered environments. They only get powered up to run a program *I* need (only runs on WIN) and only get LAN/WAN access when I wish to install a new Steam Game.
Many of use want to simply USE our computers and NOT constantly FIGHT Microsoft over what is running (or NOT!) on it!
#10
Last post by Neenyah - Today at 19:24:06
$750M where M stands for Monopoly $.