QuoteWhat about the massive subsidies and loans the US manufacturers enjoy from the US government?

The subsidies are kinda legal - as long as they are meant for the local market. Loans are also legal because one does have to repay them. Whet is illegal but difficult to prove are government grants. Those are mostly given out to develop something. Airbus and Embraer have been sued because they have developed planes using government grants and later sold those plains in international markets thus gaining unfair advantage.
But China is alleged to have given out direct payouts for every exported EV. And this is super illegal though difficult to prove.

ppi should be no less than such that no pixelation of the text is visible at any possible viewing distance. For smartphones, which are often looked at closely, this is at least 400 ppi; for monitors, in general, a minimum of 220-230 ppi (30-35cm minimum), but closer to 280-300 is better. And especially for flickering AMOLEDs, where the color resolution in smartphones is almost always lower than stated in the declarations. In order to get the same resolution on AMOLED as on a standard IPS, you will have to increase the declared resolution by at least 1.5 times.

4k, of course, is already redundant for 6-7" and only increases the wasted consumption of a smartphone due to the constant need to calculate and render a 4k image at the controller and gpu level, unless the manufacturer is trying to use this ppi for VR through special glasses. Although in general It's more of a technological nonsense.

On the other hand, 4k is completely divided into fhd, which means that if the screen matrix controller was not made by morons, there is no problem on the fly with minimal consumption at the hardware level to draw a fhd picture on a 4k screen (4 4k pixels are equal to 1 fhd pixel), and this the number will not work with the ugly resolution of 2.5k, because... it doesn't exactly divide 4k and doesn't exactly divide 1920.

This is why laptops should only have 4k matrices, and monitors should only have 8k matrices, because... 8k is also completely divisible by 4k and fhd, i.e. provides perfectly clear pixels in 8k and 4k and fhd if necessary. Especially considering the incorrect black and white anti-aliasing in Chrome. Google deliberately spoils the eyesight of all Windows users, because... Only owners of screens with ppi from 220-230 do not notice the cloudy text, because shadows become almost visually invisible and the text is already sharp enough. But such monitor owners on the planet make up less than 1% of the population. For everyone else, evil Google deliberately spoils their eyesight, which has long been a proven fact - www.notebookchat.com/index.php?msg=581872

In smartphones in general, fhd is sufficient, because... the minimum condition of 220-230 ppi has long been met there with a huge margin in pixel density, but is not met to the shame of the entire IT industry in monitor and laptop screens.

Was the author of this news very offended by the real NikoB, who pointed out his obvious oversight?

Such a powerful hysteria at the obvious stupidity written in the news.

Let me emphasize once again - all modern "nanometers" indicated for current technical processes have nothing to do with reality. The dimensions of transistor gates are many times larger and this is a proven fact. This is marketing nonsense that fools the minds of young fools, and news must be written correctly - indicating nanometers in quotation marks or always making a footnote under the news that this is a marketing name for the technical processes of a particular company and has nothing to do with the real size of the key elements on the chip.

If someone else is crap about it, then just remove these trash comments, because you, the editors, know exactly where I write and where the fake "NikoB" is. ;)

Was the author of this news very offended by the real NikoB, who pointed out his obvious oversight?

Such a powerful hysteria at the obvious stupidity written in the news.

Let me emphasize once again - all modern "nanometers" indicated for current technical processes have nothing to do with reality. The dimensions of transistor gates are many times larger and this is a proven fact. This is marketing nonsense that fools the minds of young fools, and news must be written correctly - indicating nanometers in quotation marks or always making a footnote under the news that this is a marketing name for the technical processes of a particular company and has nothing to do with the real size of the key elements on the chip.

If someone else is crap about it, then just remove these trash comments, because you, the editors, know exactly where I write and where the fake "NikoB" is. ;)

Quote from: q on April 06, 2024, 16:43:14

Quote from: NikoB on March 25, 2024, 15:20:38This 400% zoom in paint from fake "400%" from Neenyah - imgur.com/mx24l3S:
imgur.com/a/Sa8EVDg

Here is a screenshot 400% of the correct black and white anti-aliasing, already enlarged by 400% in paint:
imgur.com/a/2RmSTmd

imgur.com/a/Sa8EVDg seems to look better though than imgur.com/a/2RmSTmd, no?

    Logged

#17
Today at 10:58:30
If you're a drunk Neenyah bot, now hiding under the nickname "q" and you're seeing double, then probably muddy text in Chrome seems clear to you, and clear text in Firefox seems muddy. Well, what can I say, anyone can easily check it with their own eyes. ))

If you're a drunk Neenyah bot, now hiding under the nickname "q" and you're seeing double, then probably muddy text in Chrome seems clear to you, and clear text in Firefox seems muddy. Well, what can I say, anyone can easily check it with their own eyes. ))