In the verdict section, it talks about fast response time however in the details it says that it is 15ms... thats a weird one to be honest. anyone has clarity on same?

thanks,

Quote from: Nathan E on November 05, 2019, 20:02:29
Does this laptop actually use Optimus, if the iGPU doesn't support 4K@120Hz?  I noticed the review mentioned manual graphics switching.  If the laptop is forced to use dGPU to support the 120Hz, then this feels like Optimus is totally wasted.  I'd much rather have G-Sync support at that point!

Why? You keep the battery savings, and there's smoother motion for games when supported, you just don't get unplugged 120Hz browsing with half decent battery life. :)

Does this laptop actually use Optimus, if the iGPU doesn't support 4K@120Hz?  I noticed the review mentioned manual graphics switching.  If the laptop is forced to use dGPU to support the 120Hz, then this feels like Optimus is totally wasted.  I'd much rather have G-Sync support at that point!

Quote from: bobo on October 31, 2019, 19:06:04
So basically, all the pros are about display yet it has just 82%? lol

the colors are like way off. it's only suitable for gaming and media consumption, despite the powerful hardware and ample cooling.

Why is Emissions incomplete? Please add the noise section.

The diversity of PM981's performance is staggering...and RAID0 is generally slower than single drive.

where is my fav part-noise? hard to judge you know.
anyway, more than 40db-this 4k dollar thing is a piece of crap. and im sure it is.

15ms is too slow for fps gaming.

I like the 4K 120Hz display and hopefully, more manufacturers will push those screens following Razer. However, I would not buy Razer laptops due to QC issues. Their peripherals are good though.

So basically, all the pros are about display yet it has just 82%? lol