The Xiaomi 13 Ultra and its Huaxing C7 display have now been tested by Chinese outlet Xiaobai Evaluation. While the flagship boasts of the brightest display on a smartphone yet, brighter isn't necessarily better. It's, for sure, not more efficient, at least.https://www.notebookcheck.net/Xiaomi-13-Ultra-Tests-show-worse-display-efficency-than-the-Xiaomi-13-Pro.708582.0.html
Couldn't make any sense of this article as it's riddled with typo's. "At 100nits that's 350 nits" what?? Are these even proofread before a kid writes it
Quote from: Mdc on April 21, 2023, 16:04:42Couldn't make any sense of this article as it's riddled with typo's. "At 100nits that's 350 nits" what?? Are these even proofread before a kid writes it
Author here. What typos are you talking about exactly?
That line reads "While both are neck-in-neck at 100 nits, by 350 nits, the E6 on the 13 Pro shows an efficiency advantage..."
Thought as much...at least the display is generally used at a low brightness.
They're getting paid by Samsung or Apple just to trash the phone it's lame! This website is s***!
Xiaomi, like Huawei, is listed as a sponsor of the war by Ukraine - they have no place with their goods in the Western world, like all Chinese goods.
The same can be said about all goods from India...