AnTuTu has published its December 2020 Android flagship smartphone performance chart and the Xiaomi Mi 11 with the Snapdragon 888 has managed to take the top spot away from the Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ with the Kirin 9000. The Snapdragon 888 vs Kirin 9000 results were very close, but the Mi 11's 2K 120 Hz display tipped the difference.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Snapdragon-888-vs-Kirin-9000-Xiaomi-Mi-11-tops-the-final-AnTuTu-flagship-smartphone-performance-chart-of-2020-ahead-of-the-Huawei-Mate-40-Pro.513123.0.html
The performance of kirin 9000 that has cortex a77 can keep close to the SOC that has cortex x1 & a78?
What a78
Quote from: What on January 05, 2021, 11:38:07
The performance of kirin 9000 that has cortex a77 can keep close to the SOC that has cortex x1 & a78?
What a78
Samsung's 5nm is far behind TSMC's 5nm, actually it's very close to TSMC's latest 7nm, so the SD888 is almost a node behind because of that.
Quote from: S.Yu on January 05, 2021, 19:39:46
Quote from: What on January 05, 2021, 11:38:07
The performance of kirin 9000 that has cortex a77 can keep close to the SOC that has cortex x1 & a78?
What a78
Samsung's 5nm is far behind TSMC's 5nm, actually it's very close to TSMC's latest 7nm, so the SD888 is almost a node behind because of that.
I thought sd888 use 5nm's TSMC, i didn't know that
Quote from: What on January 06, 2021, 02:22:08
Quote from: S.Yu on January 05, 2021, 19:39:46
Quote from: What on January 05, 2021, 11:38:07
The performance of kirin 9000 that has cortex a77 can keep close to the SOC that has cortex x1 & a78?
What a78
Samsung's 5nm is far behind TSMC's 5nm, actually it's very close to TSMC's latest 7nm, so the SD888 is almost a node behind because of that.
I thought sd888 use 5nm's TSMC, i didn't know that
There's actually rumor that SD888+ may switch back to TSMC. Probably supply issues, ultimately.
Exynos siting on the corner