The Intel Core i7-1195G7 has been spotted in BAPCo's CrossMark database. The Core i7-1195G7 is expected to supplant the Core i7-1185G7 and seems to have shown good leads over the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Ryzen 9 5900HX, and the Apple M1 in this benchmark making it a good stop-gap measure in the run up to the launch of Alder Lake for mobile.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-i7-1195G7-shows-12-and-16-gains-over-AMD-Ryzen-9-5900HX-and-Apple-M1-respectively-in-BAPCo-s-CrossMark.541259.0.html
LOL BAPco. That sketchy meschbark company that totally does not favor intel and trashes AMD
First, I wanted to thank Notebook for allowing us to respond. The reason I say this because there are many other branded tech review websites that won't allow us to reply.
As everyone already know AMD is 7nm ZEN 3 generation and the other guy CPU is at 14 nm which is way behind in nanometers.
Even though Intel is using mindshare just like Nvidia does better know as - normative influence, people are now finding out to be free thinkers.
So what does that mean exactly? It's meant people want more than one type of benchmark. Like where's the benchmarks for rendering blender and Cinema 4D results or even multi game benchmarks. This isn't the case here this come off of being somewhat biased.
What does Intel do when it can not beat AMD in a benchmark.
Create new benchmark!
What does it do when it can increase number of core in a CPU? Arm twist benchmark to reduce score for multi threaded performance.
What does Intel do when TDP goes high? Reduce base clock speed and report TDP on that.
What does Intel do when it can not maintain boost clock more than few seconds due to CPU running hot. Come up with new boost clock definition and a measyfor "responsiveness"
Sad.
So what did AMD do when they lost the ghz war with their Athlon vs Pentium 4? Invent a new naming scheme with designated numbers that is much higher than the cpu actual clock. AMD did well with their Zen family cpus. Bravo to them! Great time for PC enthusiasts. We all have more choices and really powerful cpus are very reasonable now. All thanks to both AMD and Intel. If just one of them doing well, we all pay the price. This happened when AMD first had their Athlon vs Pentium 3, or when Intel dominated the market for years and years with their Core designs. AMD did a lot of dirty tricks with their bull dozers as well. Don't be a silly fanboy!
This sounds great on paper with a benchmark I have never heard of. That aside, what are the costs of these new Intel chips? How much more in a percentage are you paying for these chips? What is the cost to your pocketbook and your ability to cool these chips at similar clockspeeds to AMD's CPU's? These points are where the rubber is really going to hit the road.
I'll wait for Tim at HUB to benchmark it before drawing any conclusion, thanks.
Pls don't give wrong information.