Previous Ryzen mobility solutions were not that great compared to the desktop counterparts, and it looks like the upcoming Ryzen 3000 Picasso mobility chips are still a bit slow compared to Intel's processors. The leaked Geekbench results show that AMD's Ryzen 3000 mobility CPUs are almost on par with Intel's similar chips from 2-3 years ago.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-s-Ryzen-3000-Picasso-laptop-CPUs-get-leaked-benchmarks.377976.0.html
These are likely 15W processors. Comparing them to the 6700HQ is unfair. They should be compared to the 8550U WHL-U.
These bemchmarks and rumors are most likely fake(99.99%)
Quote from: smasri09 on December 14, 2018, 23:13:44
These are likely 15W processors. Comparing them to the 6700HQ is unfair. They should be compared to the 8550U WHL-U.
Totally agree
Dear Author,
Are you heard about ever the table? It's a great invention...I suggest you.
Let's compare these Ryzen processors to 15W Intel geekbench 4.1 scores.
Intel i3 8145U: 4090 single and 7780 multi.
Intel i5 8265U: 4714 single and 15051 multi.
Intel i7 8565U: 5114 single 13702 multi.
The i3 8145U and R3 3300U are comparable. The Intel i3 has a price of $281, I'd expect the Ryzen 3300U to come in a bit under that.
Both the Intel i5 and i7 beats the Ryzen 5 in both single- and multi-core.
The Intel i5 outperforms the Intel i7 in multi-core, which seems weird. Take these Intel scores, as well as the AMD scores with some salt.
Source: Notebookcheck.
Comparing ryzen 3 and 5, not mentioning 7, with core i7 45w is either amaterism or deception. Paid artictle....