News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by basementdc
 - October 11, 2020, 19:55:52
I have the i7 10875 1TB SSD 1920x1200 FHD 32GB 2060 MaxQ and it's a good machine once the defective trackpad on delivery was replaced (known problem with this model).  One issue is moderate banding on gradients possibly due to drivers or the 8 bit panel (Dell hasn't resolved this yet).
Posted by CFH2020
 - September 11, 2020, 07:00:23
I have the 9700 with the FHD display, RTX-2060 MaxQ, and Intel Core i7-10875H and I am not able to run the Port Royal benchmark. The test states "The rendering device is not connected directly to the selected display. The frame rate may be limited by PCI Express bandwidth and other factors." and when I run the test no results are provided. I am confused as I see you were able to run the Port Royal benchmark. I am not able to run or get a result. It starts and stops shortly afterwards with no results. Am I missing a setting? Also my FireStrike results are 12 864 which seem significantly lower than your results?
Posted by Arcturus
 - August 23, 2020, 14:12:42
Quote from: Joel on July 20, 2020, 14:40:30
I own a 9700 with an i7 + 1650Ti + FHD screen.

Joel (or anyone?) could you tell us what the panel model is for the FHD+ version?
The UHD in this review was a Sharp LQ170R1, but wondering which panel is in the FHD version.

Posted by rob484
 - July 23, 2020, 18:06:25
Waiting on the FHD+ review.
Posted by Joel
 - July 20, 2020, 14:40:30
I own a 9700 with an i7 + 1650Ti + FHD screen.

  • System flex?  It feels rock solid in my hands. It's better than literally every other laptop I've ever owned, including the first XPS 15 model and first Zbook 15 model.  Perhaps it isn't the best, but it definitely is not a con.
  • Measured at the wall, I can get a consistent 127W from the wall and my battery will charge while playing Forza Horizon 3 on High Settings (103 fps)
  • For a regular PD adapter, the laptop won't do better than 90W.  I only have 1 100W PD adapter (Choetech GaN) so it could just be the adapter.
[li]Running at 90W, I get a small battery drain when playing Forza Horizon 3 -- about 4% per hour.
[/li][/list]
Posted by bolkhov
 - July 16, 2020, 16:00:19
Allen, regarding the 100W power adapter limit:

1. Is there a specific dedicated USB-C port for charging, or ANY of the 4 can be used?

2. If the latter: is it possible to plug TWO adapters simultaneously? Will the laptop be able to pull more than 130W?
Posted by mintpep
 - July 16, 2020, 00:52:44
Quote from: kkdev9 on July 15, 2020, 23:12:06
I'm a Tech Professional and want to purchase a laptop for my work as well as personal use. My workflow includes multi resource-intensive parallel runs applications as well as photo and high-end video editing.

I had XPS 9500 and faced thermal and other issues. I had very bad experiences with the Dell Advance resolution team but had a good experience with Dell's technical service team.

I looked at XPS 17 with i7 8core, 32 GB RAM, Nvidia 2060 MaxQ , Vapor chamber cooling, excellent sound, and 4k display. However, after reading your great review, I'm holding off from XPS 17 9700.

I looked at Lenevo and they do not have i9 or 10th Gen i7 8 core processors with upgradable RAM and high-end graphics card like NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 2060 6GB GDDR6 with Max-Q.

Can you please recommend a reliable and durable windows laptop that I can use for the next 5 years without any issues which have a great 4k display for video editing, excellent cooling system, 10th Gen 8 core processor, RAM and SSD upgradeability, high-end graphics card, and great sound quality.

I occasionally play games but do not need a gaming computer,
This will be my only work machine and I need to carry my laptop for business meetings.   

Thanks in advance

HP's ENVY 15 or Zbook create(cannot say about sound quality though), depends on how much you could pay... The early impression from nbc about Envy 15 looks really good.

ENVY 15: i9-10885h/2060 max q/4K OLED/vapor chamber for about 2400 USD

Zbook create: i9-10885h/2070 or 2070s or 2080s max q/4K OLED or DreamColor LED/vapor chamber, will be released in August...

Posted by kkdev9
 - July 15, 2020, 23:12:06
I'm a Tech Professional and want to purchase a laptop for my work as well as personal use. My workflow includes multi resource-intensive parallel runs applications as well as photo and high-end video editing.

I had XPS 9500 and faced thermal and other issues. I had very bad experiences with the Dell Advance resolution team but had a good experience with Dell's technical service team.

I looked at XPS 17 with i7 8core, 32 GB RAM, Nvidia 2060 MaxQ , Vapor chamber cooling, excellent sound, and 4k display. However, after reading your great review, I'm holding off from XPS 17 9700.

I looked at Lenevo and they do not have i9 or 10th Gen i7 8 core processors with upgradable RAM and high-end graphics card like NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 2060 6GB GDDR6 with Max-Q.

Can you please recommend a reliable and durable windows laptop that I can use for the next 5 years without any issues which have a great 4k display for video editing, excellent cooling system, 10th Gen 8 core processor, RAM and SSD upgradeability, high-end graphics card, and great sound quality.

I occasionally play games but do not need a gaming computer,
This will be my only work machine and I need to carry my laptop for business meetings.   

Thanks in advance
Posted by Jakub
 - July 15, 2020, 22:50:40
Do you guys think that if it was spec with FHD+ display it would drain less power from battery ?
Posted by sandybo
 - July 15, 2020, 22:10:09
Great review! Obviously this is an engineering mistake Dell made on the power supply, let alone other system optimization problems (heat/fan/DPC) found in the review. We better wait for next gen intel where it support TB4/USB4 and multiple charging access on a single unit. This xps 17 apparently is not ready yet.   
Posted by RicoViking9000
 - July 15, 2020, 16:12:28
Notebookcheck, do you know if your device was equipped with NVIDIA's Game Ready drivers in GeForce Experience? If it came equipped with Creator Ready drivers instead, would it be possible to test some of the graphics benchmarks again with Game Ready drivers from NVIDIA's website? www.reddit.com/r/Dell/comments/hgmf58/psa_if_you_plan_on_gaming_on_your_xps_17_update/
Posted by _MT_
 - July 15, 2020, 14:27:30
Quote from: Yngmar on July 15, 2020, 12:12:54
USB-C power delivery standards only go up to 100W - that's why the power supply can't deliver more than this over USB-C. Dell cannot fix this while remaining compatible with the standard.

If they would cook their own proprietary extension of the standard, it will only work with the Dell power supply (and cable), which loses them one of the key advantages of having USB-C in the first place - a single cable that delivers power and docking connectors.

So I don't expect there will be a "fix" for this. It's just something to consider before purchase.
Yes, Dell is pushing 130 W through USB-C. Yes, you need their supply to do it. If you have a generic 100 W USB PD supply, then you'll be limited to 100 W. The problem is that some configurations of XPS 17 can't reach 130 with a 130 W supply and appear to be capped at roughly 100. While other configurations can. XPS 15 can as well.

It means that their solution has an edge over the generic solutions. The laptop is still compliant and is going to work with the generic solutions (e.g. you can recharge on the go from any USB PD charger, even a phone charger). But they won't give you 130 W. It's up to you. And I imagine the supply is compliant as well. If you connect it to anything else, it's going to behave like a 100 W USB PD supply. So, you can use it to recharge other USB PD devices.
Posted by Sterlinger
 - July 15, 2020, 14:17:48
what a waste of money, too bad, 4K+ screen is one of a kind at the moment and design is nice but too many problems, and it is not for gamer, not for audio production (DPC Latency problems) and the power supply does not work and the battery will die fast if it is drained that often
Posted by Ihor Yatskiv
 - July 15, 2020, 14:17:32
Disappointed by noise level so much. I have expected XPS 17 will be much quieter  :(
Posted by Richard235
 - July 15, 2020, 14:13:58
Quote from: benkennard on July 15, 2020, 09:10:29
weird how reviews for macbooks with small bezels aren't titled "basically an xps with mac os"

Well, that would be invalid because the point of the XPS being similar to the Macbook Pro is the change from 16:9 to 16:10 screens. That is the main selling point in this XPS entry.