Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by John A Kiser

- February 21, 2021, 02:54:43

Quote from: Paul Jones on February 19, 2021, 18:10:30
Your comments about slow RAM make no sense. Ryzen is just as sensitive, if not more to slow RAM. That is, unless they were run on seperate test benches.

The thing is that the ryzen in the benchmarks are running faster ram. We would need to see it's numbers with the slower ram to compare it.

Posted by Ketan Santosh Pawaskar

- February 20, 2021, 13:00:30

There is a huge price difference!

Posted by Wayne Rodrigue

- February 20, 2021, 00:23:46

2133Mhx is ddr4266,that's fast!

Posted by aero

- February 19, 2021, 19:50:57

1. Don't trust geekbench
2. the ryzen 5 and i5 are not even in the same price range

Posted by Paul Jones

- February 19, 2021, 18:10:30

Your comments about slow RAM make no sense. Ryzen is just as sensitive, if not more to slow RAM. That is, unless they were run on seperate test benches.

Posted by Redaktion

- February 19, 2021, 15:33:32

Intel's upcoming Core i5-11600K Rocket Lake-S CPU just showed up on Geekbench. Its single and multi-core scores of 1,565 and 6,220 might seem a tad disappointing compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, but we can attribute it to the test bench running slow RAM clocked at 2,133MHz.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-i5-11600K-falls-flat-against-the-AMD-Ryzen-5-5600X-on-Geekbench.522882.0.html