The LG V60 ThinQ has impressive hardware on paper, including a 6.8-inch OLED panel and a Snapdragon 865 SoC. However, its 64 MP primary camera sensor has been found wanting, with noisy images and a general lack of detail a theme of LG's US$800 smartphone.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/LG-V60-ThinQ-Do-not-purchase-LG-s-US-800-smartphone-for-its-cameras.482892.0.html
Used the device. This does not seem acvurate at all. Cameras were quiet good
Is very clear that notebookcheck and dxomark had some deal. dxomark is not a objective site, right now everyone that knows about technology avoids using that site as reference, and only those who don't understand about technology or photography continue the circus. You are putting the little credibility that you have at risk defending and using continuously that terrible site as a reference.
Strange as from what I could tell from Anandtech's shootout the V60 is very competitive compared to at least any Samsung flagship.
My family now owns 4 LG v60 after being a Samsung household. The author has clearly never used the cameras on the v60. Looks like a cut and paste job from a known to be unreliable source. Next time, do the work yourself. The cameras on the v60 are great and easily as good as current Samsung phones.
It's LG they will always get a bad score nothing new here. Let Samsung do the dual screen and have a DAC for audio best thing that ever happened.
It's cute you take DxO's word for it