NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on December 12, 2019, 18:00:26

Title: Samsung is working on a 5 nm Exynos 1000 SoC
Post by: Redaktion on December 12, 2019, 18:00:26
It looks like the Exynos 990 will not really be a match for Qualcomm's Snapdragon 865, and Samsung is already hard at work on a next gen SoC. According to Ice Universe, Samsung will use the 5 nm manufacturing process for the upcoming Exynos 1000, which should also include ARM's high-performance Cortex-A78 cores coupled with either the Mali-G78 or an RDNA GPU from AMD.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-is-working-on-a-5-nm-Exynos-1000-SoC.447114.0.html
Title: Re: Samsung is working on a 5 nm Exynos 1000 SoC
Post by: Leibide on December 12, 2019, 18:22:32
"ARM's high-performance Cortex-A78" does not exist.
Title: Re: Samsung is working on a 5 nm Exynos 1000 SoC
Post by: jeremy on December 12, 2019, 20:11:10
They are guessing, since Arm Hercules was pushed through certification with Samsung 5nm design tools.

Since A77 is already taken, the next is presumed to be A78.
Title: Re: Samsung is working on a 5 nm Exynos 1000 SoC
Post by: notabenem on December 12, 2019, 22:23:55
After reading arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/12/qualcomms-new-snapdragon-865-is-a-step-backwards-for-smartphone-design/ I am not sure if the (slightly?) lower benchmarks scores won't return a huge benefit in battery life etc, thanks to the built-in 4G modem? After all, my S6 is still speedwise OK for me and the 990 must be faster than the 5 year old 7420...
Title: Re: Samsung is working on a 5 nm Exynos 1000 SoC
Post by: S.Yu on December 14, 2019, 00:13:38
Quote from: notabenem on December 12, 2019, 22:23:55
After reading arstechnica.com/gadgets/2019/12/qualcomms-new-snapdragon-865-is-a-step-backwards-for-smartphone-design/ I am not sure if the (slightly?) lower benchmarks scores won't return a huge benefit in battery life etc, thanks to the built-in 4G modem? After all, my S6 is still speedwise OK for me and the 990 must be faster than the 5 year old 7420...
Wow that article, "Verizon's first public mmWave speed test hit an outrageously fast 760Mbps down"
Rather outrageously pathetic? As tested in both Xiongan and HK, 4G, LTE with 3CA or above, could reach over 1Gbps under ideal (but still real-world) circumstances. If mmWave doesn't hit 4Gbps then it's an epic fail, or an epic scam. Sub-6 could still mean 4-6GHz and the bandwidth around that frequency supports at least twice Verizon's tested mmWave speed, with worlds better stability and coverage than mmWave. Pathetic, utterly pathetic.
Seems that since the Chinese government handed a huge piece of the pie directly to Huawei, they're not in a hurry to dig in, while Qualcomm's really getting their hands dirty.