The mobile GeForce GTX 1650 is just 5 to 10 percent slower than the average GTX 1060 according to 3DMark benchmarks while costing a few hundred dollars less. It's a worthy successor to both the GTX 1050 and GTX 1050 Ti as the mobile GTX 1660 Ti is currently overpriced for what it offers.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/A-GeForce-GTX-1650-laptop-can-perform-nearly-as-well-as-the-GTX-1060-in-DX12-titles.420403.0.html
Your benchmark page says the GTX 1650 Laptop has 896 cores however it is actually having 1024 cores. Get it corrected.