Quote...and the remaining 32W are used by the other components.
Quote from: Pioter888 on May 19, 2024, 13:42:52Hi, can someone explain why power consumption in one test stabilized at ~45W and in another at 78W? Why are they throttled at different levels?
Quote from: Mr. Longuee on April 26, 2024, 18:28:50advertising China Tech and ideologyI dont get people writing something like that.
Quote from: Everything on April 22, 2024, 15:01:45@NikoB
"Who is its target audience?"
Guy who:
-Don't draw/rendering
-Don't play games
-Don't want to touch apple ecosystem even by long stick
Quote from: Hunter2020 on April 22, 2024, 19:49:09How can the screen be faked?Faked by response time and declarations for "165Hz", which should give a maximum response to B2W/G2G of no more than 1000/165 = 6ms. If you're dyslexic, that's your problem.
QuoteDisplay16.00 inch 16:9, 3720 x 1920 pixel 262 PPI, TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, glossy: no, 165 HzShouldn't that be 3072 x 1920 and 16:10?
Quote from: NikoB on April 22, 2024, 14:21:23Again, stupid non-standard resolution, not compatible at the pixel level with either 4k or fhd resolution - there will always be a slightly fuzzy picture of content made under 4k/fhd. Why not 4k 16:10, where ppi is greater than the minimum, critical 220-230? It's sad and stupid.
The screen panel is not known to panelook, but according to the author, it is completely fake in terms of response speed - a monstrous 39ms on G2G and 14ms on B2W, adding them together and dividing by 2 we get an average of 37.7 fps per second. There can be no talk of any "165Hz" here - pure fraud from the manufacturer with a frame rate nameplate. It apparently cannot even render 60fps video stably and smoothly in 100% of cases.
The author himself pointed out that lazy Xiaomi developers simply cheated their future buyers (not very smart) without even making a driver-converter for the native panel space for sRGB, which is assumed by default in Windows and in most software, which, moreover, rarely knows how to work properly with Windows color profiles. By the way, Windows itself, all versions, cannot work with its own profiles in all possible output APIs. Absurd? But these are facts.
Thus, the unfortunate (if they are not colorblind) owners of this Xiaomi product will be forced to constantly look at the oversaturated and extremely poisonous colors of the screen, without hardware calibration, which, as I wrote above, still does not work in 100% of screen display options due to the fault of M$ .
If there was a processor from AMD, in adrenaline it would be possible to turn on the auto-calibrator, even if it is rougher than hardware calibration, because... relies on the factory EDID profile, but with one setting it brings all colors into the sRGB space (RGB32), which immediately improves the visual perception by an order of magnitude, for the unfortunate owners of laptops with wide gamut panels. But here is rotten Intel, which has not had an autocalibrator in its video driver for more than 15 years, just like Nvidia. To their shame.
Processor - I do not believe in the indicated performance with PL1=45W, because... it clearly does not correlate with the results of other surveys. Expect performance much lower than in this review.
Well, as usual, the idiotic bias for a MacBook reduces the sales of Xiaomi laptops by an order of magnitude, without a normal keyboard with a full-fledged classic numpad. It's impossible to work on something like this. What else is it used for, such a laptop at home or in the office? Who is its target audience? I do not understand.
Just a bunch of negatives.