You are producing nonsense again. Unlike TV and a dynamic picture, which still loses resolution in dynamics, monitors and laptop panels are used for hours with a static picture, where text predominates. If the eyes see even a little of the pixel structure of objects, the vision and nervous system become very tired, because... the eyes are constantly refocused on the pixel structure of the objects themselves. At ppi above approximately 220-230, the pixel structure practically disappears - the eyes focus 100% of the time only on objects on the screen, they no longer see the pixel structure even from 35cm. And this is the minimum for laptop panels and monitors.
At 100"+ you don't even need 4k resolution for a dynamic picture - 1080p (well, more like 2.8k) from 2.5-3m is enough. And you certainly don't need 8k even at 200". Moreover, the angular resolution of vision simply no longer allows us to see details from such a distance. It's not bad to have 8k at 120", but there it is a secondary factor - the main immersion effect is achieved by other methods and physiological ancient factors, which all owners of cinema projectors, like me, know very well. Moreover, in industrial cinemas, these key factors in 98% of cases the audience in the hall is NOT achieved, unlike watching a movie at home.