Recent posts
#1
Last post by eri - Today at 07:10:30
I really would rather see Pana make a new GX10 camera w/ M43 using the PDAF sensor in the G9mk2. We havent had a high end M43 range finder from them in a long time....
#2
Last post by eri - Today at 07:09:07
Id like to know how its gaming performance will be, and how it stacks up in terms of performance to AMD's integrated RDNA3/4
#3
Last post by thober - Today at 07:08:32
Habe ich schon vor Jahren gemacht, allerdings mit Selbstbau Halterung. denke ich werde mir mal davon eine organisieren.
Finde ich auf jeden Fall Klasse, da ein normaler 230V Standventilator meist ein Vielfaches an Strom benötigt.
#4
Last post by eri - Today at 07:08:07
Quote from: TruthIsThere on Today at 06:34:45Yeah-yeah!
Buuuuut... when the final *commercial* release product reaches home theater systems (UHDs BluRay, ect.), MANY TIMES, all of this "RAW" stuff final results mean absolutely
nothing for the end-user(s). Why?! Well, because the final results, many of times, will still render out having many compression artifacts; colour-casting, crush, banding and tone-mapping issues that the publishing's house(s) tries to hide by injecting dancing-ants awful film-grain, rough dithering, ect.; due to many variables e.g. low-skilled post-processing editor/so-called engineer, the so-called (untalented) colourist (what?! is that suppose to be a real title/label for something that is extremely subjective by person-2-person 😏) overexposer or too much saturation and/or contrast, ect. SMH!
Its not really so much as for our enjoyment so much as for the producer & collaborator the workflow
#5
Last post by LNL incoming - Today at 06:45:02
These are very good numbers and we can only hope Snapdragon X delivers in real-world usage with retail units. However, Lunar Lake and Strix Point are right around the corner and will have powerful iGPUs and battery life that might match or even beat these numbers...all with the advantage of legacy and boutique software and driver compatibility.
#6
Yeah-yeah!
Buuuuut... when the final *commercial* release product reaches home theater systems (UHDs BluRay, ect.), MANY TIMES, all of this "RAW" stuff final results mean absolutely
nothing for the end-user(s). Why?! Well, because the final results, many of times, will still render out having many compression artifacts; colour-casting, crush, banding and tone-mapping issues that the publishing's house(s) tries to hide by injecting dancing-ants awful film-grain, rough dithering, ect.; due to many variables e.g. low-skilled post-processing editor/so-called engineer, the so-called (untalented) colourist (what?! is that suppose to be a real title/label for something that is extremely subjective by person-2-person 😏) overexposer or too much saturation and/or contrast, ect. SMH!
#9
Last post by Rx - Today at 04:57:58
HP 960 Ergo Keyboard.
#10
Last post by Rx - Today at 04:57:04
Here you go.[/url]