Wäre nicht der LOQ 16APH8 dann sogar der bessere Deal? Für 799, also 100 Euro mehr bekommt man nen geringfügig besseren AMD Prozessor, WIN11 und entscheidend ein deutlich besseres Display bei ansonst gleichen Specs. Oder überseh ich da was?

Endlich mal eine positive Nachricht für die Nahverkehrsprobleme.
Neue Technologien sind der einzig sinnvolle Lösungsansatz.

Quote from: HansHans on Yesterday at 23:08:51verstehe nicht dass AliExpress nicht dicht gemacht wird.

Weshalb sollte AliExpress dicht gemacht werden?
Dann müssten ja u.a. auch Amazon, eBay, Kaufland,... Also alle Verkaufsplattformen, die "Fremdverkäufer" zulassen, ebenfalls dicht gemacht werden.

QuoteOn the top end, AMD's proposed Strix Halo "Best" featured 8/12/16 Zen 5 cores alongside a 40 Compute Unit (CU) iGPU with a 256-bit wide memory bus and roughly 270 GB/s of bandwidth. The iGPU was said to be rivaling the RTX 4070 laptop

And then it turns out, as with Apple earlier, that there is no trace of 270GB/s there (especially outside the soldered memory) (Apple promised 400 with a 512-bit bus, but in fact it was a shameful 120-130GB/s in real tests) and that even with the 4050 it will not be able to compete in the top version.. =)

I stopped believing official declarations after a series of powerful deceptions in recent years...

I can't imagine how hot these chips will run, unless they are underclocked for notebooks - which means their performance will drop vs "up to RTX 4070 performance".

Aren't Ryzen 8000 APUs already difficult to keep cool?

In fact, copper connections are extremely unreliable - the slightest interference due to low-quality wires or dirt and high frequencies drop here. At the same time, the cable length is extremely limited.

Optical connectors are much more reliable, moreover, they are galvanically isolated from the PC power system and eliminate accidental electrical breakdown of the circuits.
An optical link can pass through much higher frequencies and multiple modulation, the bandwidth there is potentially 100 times higher. At the same time, the cable length is an order of magnitude greater, at a minimum, which can provide almost complete silence under high load on a dgpu or other powerful equipment connected via an optical channel, by moving the noisy equipment to another room or a special utility room at home (or at work).

All desktop video cards must be connected via optics - only power via copper.

In addition, a powerful optical communication channel can be simultaneously used to dock all peripherals on the desktop using different ports (already electrical). This potentially allows you to remove the system unit altogether from the desktop to the utility room of the house. There are only monitors on the desk, peripherals and complete silence while working... isn't that what we all strive for?

Why does the industry continue to kick the dead carcass of electrical connections, instead of switching to high-speed optical links, which also exclude electrical breakdown due to the excellent galvanic isolation of power circuits? I do not see any technical or cost problem in 2024 for a mass transition to long-range optical communication channels for high-speed external equipment.