Quote from: Danilio C.S on Yesterday at 11:04:17What a rubbish article, written by an Apple fanboy. It's not "Tandem OLED panels", the name of this TYPE of panel is DOUBLE LAYER OLED, and LG has had patents for them for over 10 years, they were already used in panels in some cars. The reason for not being used in other devices is the price: obviously it is at least 2x more expensive than a common OLED, but beyond the extra brightness there are no other advantages. Apple was the first to assume this extra cost, as its products have a higher profit margin.

LOL, Dell's own internal documents (which leaks earlier this month and proven to be quite accurate) call it tandem OLED. And go to Google scholar and type in Tandem OLED you will see multiple research articles calling it "tandem organic light-emitting diodes" from 2004, 2005.

All these funny games in antimonopoly matters are a smokescreen for the powerful stratum of the United States. They will never split up and really punish their large multinationals if they do everything in the geopolitical interests of the United States, but contrary to antitrust laws.

All animals are equal, but these are more equal...

In its early days, Google was a fairly customer-oriented company. Now you won't even be able to restore your account if you have all the correspondence for 20 years (previously this was easy through a robot, although there was live support). Now they have only one answer - "create a new account." They have no basic responsibility, even if someone has owned the account for decades.

We need to start with the fact that any large public service cannot unilaterally terminate and block an account without a court decision. And the recovery system should oblige you to provide recovery options even in the absence of double authorization (which is extremely dangerous from the point of view of access to your data at the level of the special services of your country - who simply gain access by substituting a SIM card for literally 30 seconds, just like the criminals who bribed cell phone employees salons).

Microsoft was the last company that did not have double authorization with forced linking of accounts to a SIM card if the client did not want it. But now M$ is completely rotten.

This is precisely a forced digital concentration camp, when you have no sane ways left without double authorization, except to maintain your own mail server on the router, which costs an additional subscription fee for an IP4 address, although IP6 allows you to assign thousands of permanent addresses without a fee.

But everyone will continue to use Windows as long as there is backward compatibility with x86 code and continuity in interface management. As soon as this is violated, interest in Windows immediately disappears. But in the absence of a sane alternative, new chaos will simply begin in the market, until someone stands out again and captures the main market share.

It is absolutely obvious (this does not require proof every time) that all large companies, without exception, conduct business using openly criminal methods, and their management and key beneficiaries should be in prison. But the system of law and "justice" is structured in favor of the rich in all countries, and not civil activists trying to prove their criminal acts. Otherwise, TNCs simply would not be able to exist on the planet. They would be destroyed by the claims of civil activists already at the stage of their consolidation for criminal methods.

Adding clickbait onto your title is pathetic

Man liest den kompletten Text durch nur um unten dann zu lesen das das ganze nur für die USA gilt und in der EU hat man keine Daten(gibt bei uns ja auch Gesetze gegen solche Machenschaften). Hätte man das oben direkt geschrieben hätte es wohl bei uns keine Klicks bekommen.
Also alles in allem setzen 6 Thema bzw Kontinent verfehlt....


LG
EU Bürger

I'm blown away by the depth of information in this post. It's clear that a lot of research and thought went into crafting it. Kristen Stewart Leather Jacket, I've bookmarked it for future reference and will definitely be sharing it with friends who I know will benefit from it as well.

Please don't let Microsoft do this and ruin yet another good thing

wishful thinking tells me the insane temperature when GPU stressing is due to the high tdp state of 25w, which under normal circumstanses should only be active for short periods of time. There is a chance furmark makes the processor behave abnormally (there has been GPU overheating issues with furmark in the past).

The game tested should have had high temperatures too if the problem was global and not application specific.