Text only | Text with Images

NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on June 04, 2019, 08:17:24

Title: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: Redaktion on June 04, 2019, 08:17:24
An AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was shown to beat the Intel Core i7-8700 in a leaked PUBG benchmark over at the Chiphell forum. The Ryzen 5 3600 was shown to average about 6.3% higher than the 8700 when both of them were paired with DDR4-3000 RAM and a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. The larger cache size on Ryzen could work well for gamers, but further data and testing are needed for an absolute conclusion.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-shown-to-post-6-3-higher-FPS-than-an-Intel-Core-i7-8700-in-PUBG.422774.0.html
Title: Re: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: Ivo Tomov on June 04, 2019, 08:33:51
As I am about to purchase a gaming laptop later this year this is really interesting to me. I wonder if the mobile versions of these Ryzen 3000 chips will be able to beat Intel. What do you guys reckon?
Title: Re: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: Matthewpl on June 04, 2019, 08:42:22
No, mobile Ryzen 3000 are just Zen+ (same as Ryzen 2000) processors in 12nm. For proper mobile Zen2 (or maybe 3? Who knows) you need to wait for mobile Ryzen 4000.
Title: Re: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: Razer sharp blade V7 on June 04, 2019, 09:02:29
Bye bye Shintel :P  It should've been understandable that when Zen masters the Fortshyte & PUBGerty number-crunching skill, it'll finally be a 100% real concern for Intlel.
Title: Re: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: RinzImpulse on June 04, 2019, 10:52:07
Quote from: Ivo Tomov on June 04, 2019, 08:33:51
As I am about to purchase a gaming laptop later this year this is really interesting to me. I wonder if the mobile versions of these Ryzen 3000 chips will be able to beat Intel. What do you guys reckon?

Nope. Ryzen laptop 3000 series is still using Zen+ 12nm, not Zen 2
Title: Re: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: Superguy on June 04, 2019, 16:36:13
Nice to see a new generation of fanbois starting up AMD/Intel flame wars from 20 years ago again. :rolleyes:

Competition is good but remember - it's just a processor made by a company that doesn't love you back. Buying a certain chip or product will not make your epeen bigger.

Like it. Enjoy it but for heaven's sake don't fight or crusade over it. It's not worth it.
Title: Re: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: Dustin on June 04, 2019, 17:14:39
AMD's K6 processors is really when they fell behind. The huge cache sizes of the Athlon processors kicked the Pentium 4 around.

And for mobile, only the APU sku's are Zen+.
Title: Re: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: wally on June 05, 2019, 11:57:40
Pretty sure I am going to purchase the Ryzen 7 3700X with the ASrock X470 M pro4.
Title: Re: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: charles j mather on June 05, 2019, 17:17:36
I'm so happy that AMD Is making some good inroads in performance.  :o ;D ::) :-*
Title: Re: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: JCourt on July 06, 2019, 19:27:45
The games Performance is more or less dependant on the GPU, Amount of players, where the player is, or what the game is currently rendering. Although I am happy that AMD is making good cpu's.
Title: Re: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 shown to post 6.3% higher FPS than an Intel Core i7-8700 in PUBG
Post by: JCourt on July 06, 2019, 19:29:14
Also, the Intel processor isn't a K type....
Text only | Text with Images