In poor countries, people drive what really benefits them, and not what is imposed by an agenda or when sponsored through unfair redistribution of taxes. And in any case, they are not able to buy and service electric cars en masse. And no one in a poor country will build infrastructure for this and increase the production of electricity, especially "green" ones. Nobody needs this except a bunch of snickering elitists. Therefore, in developing countries, they always used internal combustion engines, and will continue to do so, with the exception of local kleptocrats.
Electric cars in the general balance on the planet are no better than internal combustion engines, only from the point of view of the local ecology of cities, where conventional cars lead to monstrous smog. Rich ellois create a paradise for themselves, thinking that they can isolate themselves from the problems of environmental damage in developing countries, where batteries are made for them, or rather the most dangerous part for their production, as well as other components.
All such green "progress" comes from the transfer of dirty industries to developing countries, but this effect is illusory, because environmental damage there eventually comes like a boom to everyone without exception, because the planet is the same for everyone, both the poor and the rich.
It is necessary to develop public transport to the maximum in densely populated areas, and not selfish private transport, when one car with 4 seats carries one fat a** every day from point A to point B and back. And senseless trips should simply be stopped - only if there is an extreme justification for the need to be together for some reason. Private transport needs a red light if its transport efficiency is less than 75% (at least 3 people per car). But this again leads to a decline in the freedoms of the population. But what the hell is the difference now? After what happened in 2020?