is it just a matt coating? or is there any other difference?
how is it different from a paper-like matt screen protector films that you can put on a device?

Quote from: NikoB on Yesterday at 21:51:22hen he looks at Themis's article

typo - should be read on the statue of Themis of course. She is wearing a blindfold and supposedly should be indifferent to anything other than the logic of the law. But we all know that there are no judges of this level in any country. And if such a person appears by chance (by some miracle), the system immediately rejects him/her and expels him/her.

That is why the majority of the world's population who need a desktop or laptop will continue to use Windows, albeit in the form of pirated activation in more than 70% of cases.

Because there was and still is no real alternative to Windows, taking all factors into account.

M$ just needs to completely lose its reputation and any remaining trust (much like in the dollar), so that everyone rushes in a panic to look for other solutions.

This will only happen if M$ announces that it will stop developing Windows or remove compatibility with the entire x86 codebase. Why would they do this, cut the branch on which they (and the USA) are sitting globally? Moreover, I am 100% sure that Apple/Alphabet(Google)/M$/Intel/AMD/Qualcomm/Mediatek and other key companies are working closely with the NSA/CIA and in general with the US authorities to maintain geopolitical influence in the world through technological superiority and dependence on US technology. Therefore, even if the Indian Nadella decided to destroy Windows, he would simply be fired and kicked out, because it is not for him to decide these issues, but for the deep US authorities. As in the case of Intel and other key companies, they have not resolved any key issues for a long time without direct agreement with the US authorities or that top party in the US that really controls everything. This is only the appearance of independence of companies from the authorities; in reality, it has long been gone. Capitalism has long turned into imperialism for obvious reasons.

Als stiller Leser weiss ich normalerweise eure Arbeit zu schätzen, in diesem Fall jedoch, würde ich euch bitten diesen Artikel zu überarbeiten.

Der "Test" ist so unqualifiziert, dass man schon fast von Vorsatz ausgehen muss. In dem von euch verlinkten Artikel heißt es wörtlich "Of course, all MP6® testing to date has been conducted on the Tesla Supercharger network, with non-Tesla vehicles using the Tesla 'Magic Dock.'".

Heißt also: geladen werden Tesla's mit 400V/600A während alle anderen Fabrikate mit 400V/500A geladen werden (CCS1/2 Standard). Zudem steht Elektroautos mit 800V Architektur nur 400V Ladeinfrastruktur zur Verfügung, was per se den Test komplett nutzlos macht - insbesondere für Europa, wo alle Ladestationen bis auf Supercharger 800V+ liefern. Der Witz ist, selbst in den USA lädt der Cybertruck nun schneller am Konkurrenznetzwerk von Electrify America als an Superchargern...

Wenn ihr ordentliche Ladetests vorstellen wollt, schaut vorbei bei P3, ADAC, Edmunds, Out of Spec Studios oder Björn Nyland's Youtube Kanal. Bei Out of Spec Studios 10% Challenge hat das Model 3 LR "Highland" gerade schlechter abgeschnitten als das "alte" Model 3 RWD mit LFP Zellen...

Quote from: Trunks on Yesterday at 21:37:03So, this laptop is for one looking for a light multimedia laptop. It can also do light tasks such as office, entertaiment very well, with a good battery life.

This is for those who use the laptop 2-3 hours a day or for fools who will quickly kill the battery with more time in real surfing, etc. tasks.

Normal people use laptops (they work at home for 10-12 hours at least), especially modern ones with huge consumption only from the power supply, because outside the power supply they sharply lose performance for all components. When working from a power supply on beds and sofas, in a relaxed state, reclining, and not at a table (why sit at a table at home? If you are sitting at a table, turn on a desktop with a large monitor and sit in complete silence with greater productivity), it is impossible to use such moronic series right-handers - because Legs on the left and USB-C power breaks out within 1 month. This is not up for debate, these are facts.

This moronic series is NOT suitable for working at home 100% or relaxing with it for more than 2-3 hours. It is only suitable for housewives to use 2-3 hours a day. The battery will die within 1.5 years guaranteed if you charge it every day. That's why it is not popular - it gathers dust on shelves everywhere. All warehouses are filled with this series, because... no one needs her. If the stupid Lenovo developers (or rather their stupid marketers) had made the power supply in the back (or 2 USB-C on the left and right, as it should have been initially) or with a durable angled round plug on the left or right - sales would have immediately increased significantly. But apparently increasing sales is no longer interesting to Lenovo...

Only idiots or those who have easy extra money change laptops every 1.5-2 years.

The article is completely unreliable - you cannot compare the results of Geekbench version 5 with the results of version 6... Metal M3 score is about 47K