Motorola's Moto E20 offers good performance and a low weight for less than 100 Euros. On the other hand, you have to make concessions in areas such as battery life. Is the inexpensive smartphone really worth it?
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Motorola-Moto-E20-Smartphone-Review-Lightweight-phone-in-honeycomb-design.583492.0.html
Weight and noise should be eliminated from reviews, so the final number will be more meaningful; weight should fall inside chassis, while noise it's unimportant. What's average? Also, this phone can't be 'Good', it's 'Decent' at most; and even with this system in place it's 74%. Temperature should eventually be more streched and penalize more, like throttling.
I take your reviews as reference, just to point out.
It's a nice, interesting design and some of these OEMs seem to have better designs on the low end, where management cannot interfere, than on their expensive phones. Last year I thought that Samsung's A52 was a more coherent and 'modern' design, and that Apple's 12 phones had that hideous shiny logo, which is not present on the SE. This is another phone, plastic design, which is far more successful than many more expensive phones.
And having a textured back is a good idea that has been abandoned for cases, I know, but it's still a shame that we lost them. Occasionally phones get used without cases, after all.
One of the most informative phone reviews I've ever seen. Just wow.